Could be something as simple as total freedom to experiment .
IE;well let you imprint your total Ethos on the Club so long as you take the players we let you have ,significantly self generated ,which he's accustomed to and maybe just maybe attractive dollar.
glad you cleared that up .
the way you phrased It left It a tad ambiguous .
Re MUTTON For NW and others ,he was Flooded with E-mails at the time he was making comments in public that were personal and should never have been made as a council leader.
It's generally been a pleasant experience to meet other posters In real life when chatting while travelling to a match.
In fact whatever the viewpoint Pro/Anti etc we all are family ..
It's not like In the past you could'nt express you're opinion at the game to a complete stranger and gain...
Which begs the question ,what relevence can there be to the counter SISU are now involved In,as i would say there Is no counter and they will be made to pay .
He's saying there were no implied terms in the Contract that had the clause ,that should talks break down SISU were liable to £29k.contribution to Higgs costs incurred ,and once the six week period of HOT was over no right to expect exclusivity.