Search results

ACL have publically stated they will not talk until the outstanding amount is paid, now resolved, and SISU stop any further appeals or legal action. There has been no statement from ACL to say their stance has changed and there has been nothing from SISU to say they are dropping further legal...

Is that the first time recently they've said Coventry and not Coventry area? Wonder if that is just an error or something more deliberate? Sadly no mention not pursuing further legal action so I wouldn't have thought much chance of things moving forward.

There was doubt who actually had control over the money wasn't there? If its in escrow controlled by the FL and ready to go why isn't the FL just paying it today rather than stating SISU must pay it by next Thursday?

Now we need it paid ASAP to remove one block to talks. Lets hope the money doesn't suddenly disappear out of escrow before it reaches ACL. Just need SISU to say there won't be any appeal and everyone can start talking again. I suppose its too much to hope that common sense prevails.

what was the p in the £ offer in the CVA? it could be that they have taken the £300K paid to ACL off the amount owed prior to the p in the £ offer and then worked from there which is what Appleton should have done. Doesn't this now leave GR and MM a route to claim the money back off SISU, no...

That's my point, if it was £4m last year it should be £4m this year, if it isn't then the claim from SISU when we moved that there would be no financial impact due to the move as they could cover it is totally false. That's before you even consider the 750K for Clarke, £3m for Wilson and...

Those two statements seemed to contradict each other. We were told the move to Sixfields would not impact on budgets as SISU would cover any losses so how, despite several unexpected windfalls last season, can the playing budget be cut by 40%? Without the points deduction we wouldn't have made...

This is tonight and it's on CWR if anyone is still interested in the football side of things. Don't expect anything to do with the Ricoh or business side of things to be discussed, it's the usual start of the season forum. This year we've got SP, McFarlane and Waggott.

Or they could just be completely incompetent.

Had to chuckle, according to twitter Fisher has been telling people todays meeting is in Preston, not sure who he's meeting as everyone else is in London!

The FL prove themselves to be a joke once again. Something that, for us at least, is important and we have been pressing for a answer for a while and they can't even be bothered to make an announcement when Simon is there ready and waiting. As usual not a second to stop and think about the fans.

Grendel is correct there is not a debt based in law so should SISU refuse to pay there is little ACL can do. More worryingly for us however is the FL Insolvency Procedure requires that a payment equal to any payment offered in a rejected CVA must be made for the proposed owners, in our case...

From reading Simon's twitter I'm not certain the FL are actually going to let anyone know what's been decided.

No chance of this I would have thought, the club is now owned by a totally separate company to the one being liquidated. If, as SISU have stated, the money is in escrow under the FLs control and this is something the FL agreed to then there will be no problem. Of course if its not something...

Really hope it's true but I think we've all learnt by now not to get our hopes up and take a believe it when we see it stance.

So are they actually paying to sponsor us as that makes it sound like they've given us some freebies in return for having their name on the (away) shirt. Hope it's just the way the article has been phrased.

It popped up on my news feed, no reason or need to keep looking at his profile.

Baker on his facebook profile.

So now it is being said that the lack of a squad number for Baker was a misunderstanding. Not sure if I'm convinced by that, mistakes do happen but surely as soon as it came to light and was getting publicity a quick we've ballsed up and he should have had a number statement shouldn't take too...

There was a very obvious reason ACL made the offer via the FL. At the time they had been making offers to SISU yet SISU were claiming they hadn't received them. Given the timing of the offer made via the FL I suspect it was an attempt by ACL to show the FL that the option of having us playing in...