Search results

Throught the same trust who welcomed Wasps with open arms and swallow every bit of Wasps PR but challenge the club on everything? Remind me again, are they the Sky Blue trust or the Wasps trust? It needs to be disbanded and started again. Extra income how? If we as fans didn't buy anything in...

Go support them then Dongo.

No but they can have you if they want?

Or in the corridors of CCC or CSF or Higgs. Let's all blame SISU though.

Yet you are persistently negative about the club. They may own the Ricoh but as said if we are successful, commercial money will increase. We will have more fans. Now those two sources may take away from Wasps. The Ricoh being associated with CCFC and not Wasps is not what they want, but it is...

That is the problem, they don't see worth or potential, they see threat. They see competition. If decision makers had any affinity to the club, the Ricoh wouldn't have been sold like it was and we wouldn't be having this conversation about the academy. The decision makers are deliberatly...

Move to Rushden or Worcester? Hahahaha. Got your Wasps season ticket yet? Do they promise you all a free ST if you come on here and help bang their drum? Italia certainly earns his.

Perhaps for fear of losing money if they are not successful?

The trust is not fit for purpose. The way they welcomed Wasps with open arms after being so against Northampton puts them up there with Italia and his hypocrisy. I don't get the whole Wasps have no problem/don't care about CCFC. They do, massively. We are there biggest obstacle to success and...

I think the council have well and truly pulled the wool over peoples eyes here. They are vermin, every last one of them. They have no regard for the club, the city or it's people. Just their own self interests. Very much like SISU, only difference being SISU are called out for it.

You say stood up for themselves and call SISU bullies. Yet then claim it's nothing to do with morals? You think SISU are nasty bullies? The baddies to the councils goodies? So how was my post incorrect?

That they along with SISU thought withholding the rent would be good as it would reduce the value of the YB loan.

It was part of the initial road map set out between sisu and the council when they were talking. It didn't come to fruition for whatever reason. The council have never denied it.

It was reported the council were ok with the idea initially. No blinder person than someone who doesn't want to see.

I'm angry because you don't agree with me? Spin it how you like ;) Funny how one post you quoted Otis replied to and didn't think I was angry and I had a point. Now would you say Otis is angry?

Another one. Point out to me where I said they want to invest? People want them to invest.

I think he believes the council is full of upstanding citizens with good morals and strong principles. The sort of people who wouldn't accept gifts that could be viewed as a bribe. Oh wait....

Yeah to drive down the value of the bank loan. Not surprisingly this is rarely mentioned or remembered.

Did the council not think this was a good idea originally? Were they not in cahoots with SISU about this?