Search results

I expect us to be higher than fourth from bottom in the value for money league. I thought I’d made that pretty clear. All of these points apply to everyone at our level who hasn’t got PL riches.

More bold decisions against a pointless media storm whipped up by middle class women. Why on earth taxpayers should compensate women for not checking their mail for 15 years I’m not sure. Starmer derangement syndrome sure gets you angry at some weird stuff.

What would he even do? Last time he was leader of a party he wanted taxi drivers to wear a uniform didn’t he? His whole thing is whatever grift will earn him some money.

Malc, don’t click for your health. https://www.economist.com/britain/2024/03/27/british-boomers-are-losing-out-for-the-first-time

Excellent. Only deporting immigrants is just too soft. Deport everyone.

If it happens at home we should invest in a directional mic and broadcast it on the big screen and over the tannoy (though it’ll still be secret considering our tannoy)

I mean it’s seems to be consensus we are lacking in the middle. And it’s not at DM so it’s either Torp or Rudoni who loses out. I agree on Haji. I don’t think we got a bargain but I don’t think we overspent now. As it stands though he’s the only player I’d be confident on making a profit on...

The populist right has no intention of lowering immigration. We know this cos we just had them for five years an immigration skyrocketed. Trump stopped Rs voting for immigration measures so he could use it. Anyone who votes Reform or Trump expecting lower immigration is a rube.

FPTP doesn’t favour over the air, low ground support, geographically diffused parties. Like when the Lib Dem’s “surged” in 2010. Also Trump won’t be in power in 2029 and we have no idea if Musk will still have his latest fascination. These aren’t reliable political allies we’re talking about...

The argument for lowering immigration isn’t right or left wing it’s about democracy. The country has very clearly had a majority for lower immigration for almost 20 years. Any government that doesn’t deliver it isn’t representing its constituents.

Im not sure how hiring more people to ensure more people get benefits is austerity but sure. Buzz word I guess.

If that’s your sub I won’t judge.

Just like every previous Christmas when it was an anti Tory song then. Watching the right work out what opposition is like sure is entertaining.

Government. That’s who normally builds and operates things there’s no economic case for. I’m just not sure why you’d refuse to build anything in case somewhere a house is built without what you’d consider the right amenities.

And they do now? You liberalise so that you don’t have to rely on the kindness of large developers.

This Chief Prison Inspector of Probation who says he totally understands but would like more resources for probation or is there another one? https://archive.ph/C5AFb Your emotional reaction and desperate insults tell me I’m bumping up against you capacity here. And that’s fine. But maybe shut...

I mean it is a fair solution…

Ive generally thought we’ve been one of the fittest teams the last five or six years TBH. Not sure about L2, but certainly since we’ve come up. Our record at the end of games is excellent.

🎶 Number 1 is Josh Eccles And number 2 is Josh Eccles 🎵