Search results

And City winning and just about every single rival dropping points. Nowt sweeter than that.

Yeah, I can see that, but I don't want to see Notts County get any momentum back. I do realise they have Accrington after that, but as I say, I think if they beat Wycombe they would then go into that Accrington game with a spring in their step ànd they have only lost two games at home all...

Not sure. Want to see Notts County continuing to fade, so would take a City win and a draw in that game. Claw back 2 points on both Wycombe and Notts County.

It's a feminine sheet, so absolutely fine.

Yep. Spot on. We need Wycombe to wobble further and we can only afford one slip up I think. Still some potential banana skins ahead. Would take a draw at Newport, though a win would be brilliant.

How can downright clear cheating only be considered a lesser category of offence? Sounds barmy to me.

I am slightly more optimistic. 25%-30% right now. Yeah, it does look like Wycombe are the ones we are going to have to catch for 3rd spot..

Do feel sorry for him, cos I think that foul for the pen was clearly outside the box.

That's a Wiki error then. They have 66 as the best return.

Could it not be argued that we SHOULD be top 3 anyway?

Stead is 34 and Ameobi, 36. Lack of pace.

Yeah, but surely we cannot use that. A draw was much better in those days, resulting in your gaining only one single point less than a win. It just altered the way teams played and the way they set up. Had there been 3 points for a win we might have as a team gone to try and win more games and...

Interesting. Because not so long ago people were calling for him to be sacked.

Just promoted in general or automatically?

But especially the centre backs, because Stokes has been distinctly average and so too Haynes. Grimmer has looked good, but all the centre backs have been outstanding at one time or another.

Whoo hoooooooooo!!! Sink like the Titanic you Magpies!!!

What would that one reason be? I would say the fact that we have 4 very decent centre backs. That has ensured that we have had such a tight defence all season long. Has to be doesn't it? Yeah, there have been McNulty's goals, but without that back four we would be much further down the table...

I honestly think they should let them try and get across. It would be like It's a Knockout where people would be all greased up trying to climb a pole. They would surely all be tripping over and falling into the tarpauline and getting themselves more and more embedded as they went. Be like...

Can you actually get odds on someone moving seats?

Well either that or we just totally dismiss Clarrie Bourton's 50 goals in a season as not that great.