Search results

But you would still be left paying a player for two years who is not good enough to play in our league. Do you really think Robins would do this, particularly when money is so tight?

One is at the start of his career, with the potential to improve and to add significant financial value, the other is coming to the end of his career with no real sell on value, mainly due to being at this stage of his career. None of the above is the point. The question is really who added...

If he thought like you, that Kelly is not Championship calibre, why would he have re-signed him at all? Furthermore, why give him a two year contract? I don't see why this is Sheaf v Kelly. If Kelly isn't good enough for this division then don't keep him on, irrespective of whether we have...

Why does Robins see things so differently from you?

I think Kelly's two spells back in the team after his injuries were a major factor in us staying up so comfortably. We were visably a better team when he played. Obviously stats play an increasingly important role in today's game. Thankfully they haven't replaced the idea of forming opinions on...

Jobello played, I think, the first nine games of the promotion season.We were unbeaten in those games.The first game he missed, Rotherham away, we got thumped. I think that saying Jobello's injury was a catalyst for promotion is almost as big a myth as saying that Jones injury helped us get out...

I think Jones is a really skillful player who, if he can stay fit can make an impact in the team. More of a goalscorer than O'Hare,I think that both him and Jones could work well together. Based on last pre season, I feel, had he stayed fit, he would have featured in the team quite a lot.

You have the wrong Thomas. I think the one who flattered to decieve was Connor not Luke. (Luke was a good player for us).

Makes you wonder why Robins kept him on for not one, but two more years. For me, both Kelly and Hamer were more than up to the level. Yes, Hamer's form tailed off in the second half of the season, down to tiredness and the relentless nature of the league as much as anything. Kelly remains one...

Which one of Kelly or Hamer isn't up to the Championship?

I'm just being pedantic really. Had Robins not come in then we could have ended up like Notts County. As it was the season in League Two was the turnaround season.

He is, but for me so is Kelly. I think Walsh would be too with his best days still to come.

Based on how James and Kelly played for us last season and how Walsh played in League One, I would still have the same opinion of these players whether James had signed for us or not. Its just a point of view that’s different to yours.

Walsh doesn’t have to be PL class, just up to a good Championship standard. It was you who mentioned James and his PL days, which seem to be behind him.

To be honest, the year in League Two wasn’t that bad and ended very well, it was the several years that preceded it that were the problem.

He might have been good enough for the PL at one stage, but as no PL team came in for him, you would have to say that the Championship is now his level. I like him, he is a good player but of the two I would sooner have Walsh.

Yes I think you're right. I would be an unmitigated disaster if I were the manager. But then again I think you would be too! I would sooner have Kelly and Walsh than James, just an opinion.

All about opinions. If I had to pick the player who contributed most to our promotion then it would be Walsh. It was a league below and he has missed a year but I think he is such a good player he would still be a major influence for us in the Championship. If I had to pick between Kelly and...

I liked James, but if there was a choice, I would much sooner have Walsh.

How can you be positive about something that you don't think will happen? If you don't think it will happen doesn't this also mean that you think Sisu are again stringing people along? Also I am sure Boddy himself has stated that he is not involved in anyway with the new stadium. For what it's...