Search results

If he's involved no wonder the talks failed!

Infections is a tricky one to use as an indicator of anything as they aren’t even saying how many people are being tested.

Of course it's true, things really are beyond parody now. If anyone came up with this shit for a TV show it'd be binned for being too unrealistic.

Not just HS2, there's the A46 relief road going through there and other parts of that land Warwick Uni already have plans for.

Doesn't look great really. And for a company that keeps such a close eye on its PR you have to assume they realise that but feel the danger of being properly questioned outweighs the negative PR.

Would rather it be a local firm but if not then whoever will pay. We‘re not in a position to be picky.

Doesn’t that mean they change the colour of their home kit every year?

Indemnification could involve the council and this statement still be true. Given councillors have been ordered not to comment it would suggest the words have been carefully chosen and any ambiguity may not be accidental.

Did Delaware takeover Compass role in IEC or did Wasps dissolve IEC and outsource the whole thing to Delaware?

Also have to consider the deadline was already an extension given by the EFL.

Finham was for the academy when they were being kicked out of Higgs by Wasps.

This always astonishes me. They go on about nobody should trust SISU yet their club caused issues for QPR and Wycombe and have a history of lies that puts SISU to shame.

ACL is part of Wasps. Wasps Holdings own 100% of ACL who own 100% of Arena Coventry 2006, they also own 77% of IEC.

When the likes of the Telegraph, Trust, PSB chap and salop888 are starting to change their stance you know you've royally screwed up.

Retail partners aren't likely to be involved. Their deals are with ACL. Any access to F&B will come from the share ACL currently gets. But again if the issue is genuinely a 3rd party that doesn't stop Wasps saying they have no issue dropping the NDA.

Regarding the suggestion the NDA can't be dropped because other parties need to agree to it. If you believe that surely the easy answer for Wasps is "yes we're happy to drop it if everyone else agrees". Why are they saying no on somebody else's behalf?

Notice Wasps statement is nice and vague and doesn't actual address any of the specific issues such as the EFL directly informing them of a deadline.

CCFC: this is what happened, we have the evidence to back it up and are happy to release it CCC: nothing to do with us Wasps: that's not what happened but we won't let you release the evidence

Wasps statement stinks of BS. Realistically who else is involved in talks around us playing at the Ricoh? You've got the council as freeholders who say they aren't involved, Wasps themselves and the football club (who have said they are happy to drop the NDA).