Search results

Five more signed up

Because they wouldn't sell anywhere near enough to make up the lost revenue. Look at when they discounted season tickets last season, made very little difference.

From a couple of days ago

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/old-power-station-site-back-11364583 30 acre site up for sale for £4-5m. Its the site of the old power station in Aldermans Green.

Sad news. Those involved in the golden era of CCFC are fading away.

Everyone was reset to 0 when we moved to the new forum. Nicks been manually adding them back for anyone who asks.

Its things like that which really bring home how far we've fallen.

Not flying back for Nuneaton?

Nobody is on a bus or driving it. People like the idea of a city centre stadium, that's about it. All people are saying is don't rule it out and lets see some detail of how it compares against staying at the Ricoh.

What are you basing this on?

Have you seen the financial forecasts for both scenarios then? Would be nice if you could share them with the rest of us.

Good news, lets hope they manage to come thought and claim a place in the side.

Is this only for games with England and Wales in or a general rule?

Says they will fly out the day after Nuneaton.

Mowbray has said he doesn't want to play other L1 teams so it will be mostly L2 teams in pre-season. He's also looking to take the squad away after Nuneaton but only want to play one game while away.

Wouldn't mind something like that. You'd probably be better having Coventry than CCFC then it would fit both teams. Wouldn't be too bothered about dark blue / white seats to match the existing stand either.

Can someone ask the question OSB raised about the accounts. Appreciate there is zero chance of it being answered on the spot but if its flagged up so we can get a response when they've looked into it that would be great.

You can tell it was close otherwise they would mention the %

I'm lost, is it something we should be worried about / asking questions about or not?

Strange how they don't mention the actual result of the poll in the article. It was pretty much 50/50 while voting was open.