Search results

You mean spam him into submission and force him into closing one of the few methods of communication we actually have with the club?

They want us to think all wrongdoing is a thing of the past and it's an all-new fresh start. The majority of people see through this it seems.

I don't think anyone can deny that the team needs a good clouting after recent form.

When they say it's not for sale, I'd take that to mean they're not actively looking for a buyer or offering the club. Of course if some unhinged tycoon wanted to throw money at them, they'd take it. Goes without saying.

Every club has to be a brand, it's 2011. Football doesn't exist merely on the pitch, so any ventures that are aimed towards the betterment of what happens on the pitch is alright by me, even if it's drowned in marketing yap yap.

That's just part of them revealing a little bit at a time.

It could be a surprise meeting, like a birthday party. Whoever asked the council has ruined it, and now they'll have to send the cake back.

They've assumed the debts, so they're owed that at the very least. It's akin to transferring a credit card balance.

They did invest in the improvements to Ryton, it's since then they've had to then mortgage it to keep the club afloat.

If it was the manager, it'd have to be a big name in order to be the biggest thing since we moved.

They wouldn't build up bad news in such a way, I'd have thought.

We can say for certain that we're not changing from the Sky Blues to the Electric Pinks. Who did I lose that bet to?

I remember when the Guardian were talking about a HUGE STORY breaking at 5pm, and it turned out to be that Inter were planning to bid for Gareth Bale. I'm expecting very little. Please prove me wrong CET.

I'm just happy I shelved my original plans to get up at midnight and hit f5 on the official page until it appeared.

This isn't the statement, clearly. We've got about 5 more pre-ambles before the REAL statement, which is exactly which shade of blue Puma are using.

He'd be better off not responding as such in future, but 'wise up Jordan' is about as much backlash as he should officially get as far as I'm concerned.

It doesn't seem to mention Ranson's new role only being until the end of the season like the initial reports suggested, is that still the case?

Just gone up now on the OS:

He probably should have been a bit more careful, but it's important to remember he was responding to provocation. Bear in mind he's still only 19 and most likely trying to enjoy his time away from what must be a very frustrating time at the club. I'd hate to think that anyone abusing someone on...

So a protest that's in part caused by a lack of money is going to cost the club more money.