Search results

And did the case rest on his evidence? The point I’m driving at here is that it wasn’t just that paper that she was convicted on but witness statements as well. The defence seems to be focusing on this (they would wouldn’t they?) but the conviction wasn’t based on this alone.

Ban sales of those stupid coats for a start. Over 18s only. Everyone else gets short trousers and a pacamac

Hes 4th choice CF in a team that usually plays one up front. How much depth do we need?

New evidence or argument according to this: Lucy Letby application received by Criminal Cases Review Commission - Criminal Cases Review Commission

How did they get access to the evidence?

But they’re just interested third parties, not the appeals panel or people with access to the evidence?

Yeah.

This is still just randoms who haven’t seen all the evidence and are going of media reports right?

No Pete they’re the worst government ever Twitter told me.

On loan for L1 for a season. Let him get regular games in English football and file some of the rough edges off.

See above.

Trump gets far more free press. Not sure what you can do about that TBH. Same issues as Labour here, both fringes and the right against him, still gets blamed.

Im not sure Biden was hiding things like the CHIPS Act and action on the border.

Shouldn’t have told him, give him FOMO

If winning four in a row gets you one then Robins should have about five!

Dare you to ask about a Robins one at the same time Pete.

Or that people who don’t rate Sheaf don’t know what they’re on about?

All depends who goes doesn’t it? Assuming no one and a blank cheque (both unlikely TBF) I think LB and CM (8) are the positions I’d focus on. I’d still like RB cover and an upgrade at CB if we can’t make 4ATB work with this squad. But any of Sheaf, MvE, Wright could go, even Rudoni if he keeps...

Wonder if we try a 541 box with Torp and Rudoni ahead of Grimes and Sheaf when they’re all fit. Makes it even harder on our forwards though. Nice selection problems to have.