Search results

Not really related, but I remember seeing someone take an almighty fall trying to catch a foul ball at an MLB game. He was fine, but it was the kind of height someone could easily have died from. Also, he caught the ball and held on to it even when falling. That's commitment baby.

I still have issues over his handling, primarily from mistakes made earlier in the season (Palace in particular). I think he's got Westwood beat when it comes to distribution though.

You do see the kids swarm for those balls, I'm surprised nobody's taken a fall. Incidentally, did someone get to keep the ball Jutkiewicz charitably fired into the crowd late on?

The guys searching were a charming bunch indeed, but please can people stop going on about the big shirt they wave about and then put away quickly as if it has any relevance to the rules surrounding things kept in the crowd.

I thought he had a good game. Whether that's 'a good game' or 'a good game for David Bell' is another thing.

McDonald's still off the pace a little, not as involved as he was at times at Ipswich. Jutkiewicz had a good game bar an obvious downer. Overall we can't really sniff at the point, even if it's gutting to miss out on three points.

The main problem here is seeing a common phrase and taking it literally. If he says 'the lads gave 110%', promise me your head won't explode.

Wait, what's this?

The council are loaning us some players, there's a meeting set for today.

Title: First line of article: Journalism at its finest.

Blimey, where was I getting 22 from?

The two best games ever made for me are either Zelda Link to the Past or Grand Theft Auto San Andreas. Both are epics (in the actual sense of the word, not the recent way the word has been hijacked and ruined by idiots)

When you find out Darth Vader was actually a ghost all along and has a penis.

Arguing about 'big clubs' is a meaningless snoozefest, it doesn't actually mean anything outside of the parameters people set to suit their argument. Preston were one of the more prestigious sides in the land and have a rich history so could argue their case, but that doesn't mean a lot to them...

Adam Le Fondre isn't a Cov fan, so it's quite easy to say that joining a club who were recently in the Premier League and who aren't struggling in nearly every way was the better move for him.

It reads fairly innocuously to me : 'I know (Coventry) had a firm interest in me, but I picked the better club. Coventry are a good club, but with the way Reading develop players and the platform they have here, it is a great way for me to improve as a player and go forward.' I don't think...

He's talking about how he made the right choice for his career, it's really not arrogant nor an attack on us. If we were to either be enraged or spurred on by players preferring to join other teams we'd be in a constantly motivated rage.

They're really not alike, this is actually the first time I've ever heard anyone blame Irwin. There was a collision and a terrible accident, not a malicious or clumsy tackle.

You created this thread aimed at everybody to jab at two of your friends? I for one believe this.

Irwin wasn't at fault for Busst's injury in any way, it was the way Busst planted his foot.