Search results

Its Walliams and Miranda Hart next week. That could well be the worst program the BBC have ever aired.

For me it comes down to a couple of simple points: 1) CCC should not even have considered selling to a team from outside the city. That would apply in any circumstances but after they had taken every opportunity available to condemn CCFC for playing temporarily in Northampton you would expect...

Whatever you think of the sale price of ACL or the subsequent valuation of the lease by Wasps you can't really doubt that a 250 year lease is worth more than a 50 year one. Makes the question of why it wasn't extended prior to the sale a valid one. Even more so when you consider the extension...

Any sale will be for a £ but unless the new owner is taking on the debt and committing to repaying in full that will have to be settled as part of the sale.

There's not really a lot to be taken from what he actually said. The only bit of the article that's a quote is:

Wouldn't get auction off, the club would just cease to exist. They'd reshuffle by changing the various numbers of teams promoted and relegated. If a new club was started it would be well down the pyramid.

I've already ordered my t-shirt

That's the thing isn't it. As long as SISU have been talking about ground ownership we've been told CCFC is nothing to ACL, a small % of income and they could do fine without us. So we left and they kept insisting that ACL was still fine. Then they sold ACL at a knockdown price still claiming it...

And not being exactly pleasant to anyone who had a different point of view.

There will be a fine, possibly a suspended points deduction to try and prevent repeats. The police will no doubt go after at least a handful to 'make an example', they'll probably go after people from the naughty corner they already know but haven't been able to pin anything on in the past.

I like Designated Survivor. Just go with it and don't think too much about the plot holes!

At what point can we move to the Butts in its current state, conference?

But you still need to have the cash. Lets say your income is £10m, so your player budget can be £6m. Your non-player costs are £7.5m. What happens if you spend £6m on players? You've spent £13.5m against an income of £10m.

They may well be, if they are that would be a big help to anything that targets them. You would assume if SISU are struggling it means their funds are struggling but that is really the key. Lets face it the type of people that would be reading this wouldn't give a shit about the demise of a...

It still has to show in the accounts paid or not. They can but if you can't spend it twice. Prior to Maddison being sold a loan was taken out to cover cash flow issues, the sale of Maddison allowed the loan to be repaid. There's different sets of figures, doesn't mean he's lying. You've got...

It would certainly be the most effective way to get at SISU. But how do they perform overall. If the funds are providing growth overall how concerned would the investors be about the individual components of the fund?

There were people calling / texting CWR after the match saying similar so if they contacted Fisher directly or not is a bit of a moot point.

But why would SISU pay him so much? Look at salaries for chairman of far bigger organisations, people that are working full time and in very high profile roles. They are a fraction of what it is being claimed Fisher is paid to run a business that has for years been running at a loss.

It was Waggot that messed it up wasn't it? Problem is we don't know how far out it was. What was the average paid per person last season? You'd need that figure and then multiply it by the difference between the earlier and later break even figures and then multiply the result of that by the...

With the club operating on a shoestring budget who is paying Fisher £600K a year? As much as you need someone in that position and those people tend to cost a fair bit more than anyone would think they are worth what value is there in paying him that?