Search results

That was it yeah, the contrast between a first half that allowed me to be optimistic and then that car crash in the second. What a mess.

Not me guv! I mentioned earlier in the thread that I didn't see much reason for him to be ditched in the games he played. He looked pretty handy.

I've got no idea what people are arguing about, but that Bury game second half was when the realisation of League One hit hard for me. Was that Thorn's swansong?

Damn you to hell and back.

If it's harder, how come Saracens have never won the Superbowl? Killer logic.

In his defence, you could sum up a lot of this place by picking any thread that's gone over about 10 replies.

We should invest in a balloon printing firm at the same time. You then do something shitty as owner, and we rake it in on those expensive 'nonleagueherewecome out' balloons. This time next year we'll be millionaires!

Surely it's not confirmed until they announce it.

The official site is really just strait-laced confirmation and statements.

Ace. If it's nice on Saturday I might mosey on down with my foam hand collection.

So then if they haven't said that it's more promising than worrying I'd have thought? The public statements are really for the administrator and club to make, they must be wary of going to the press after it was cited as the reason behind previous talks falling apart.

As Sky Blue Kid mentioned, it seems a little unfair to assume Malaga's some kind of horrible Winston Bogarde-lite who wants an easy life (he did move from Nice to Coventry after all). With players on the way out he could possibly see it as a chance to force his way into contention.

I don't think it's fair to put Bell in that group. He's played quite well and put in no little effort in the few games he's managed this season. The big issue is how many he missed.

I don't think it's really in anyone's interests to be running to the media to report on meetings as soon as they happen.

He looked a bit of a goal threat in his little spell in the team didn't he? I didn't really see anything in those games to suggest he should be completely turfed out of the squad.

The problem with Bell is that for a club struggling financially, it's hard to justify paying a player who must have spent a large percentage of his tenure here out injured.

A load of tiny players at that time too. Like a team of David Vaughans.

I'm just calling a spade a spade here. Swarthy, handsome spades.

It'd be lovely if our biggest concern was who'll play on the left of midfield or a player having an injury. Maybe one day.

I'm very sorry for 95% of BBC3.