Search results

Five games over 15K last season. Gillingham 15,604 (857 away) Oldham 15,419 (259 away) Port Vale 17,779 (1,283 away) Walsall 15,671 (1,359 away) Burton 17,140 (1,542 away) So in total over the course of the whole season you'd be looking at less than 9K home fans, or under 375 a game who...

If they're putting a pool in they would have plans wouldn't they? One quick look at the plans and the trust would be able to tell us if they allow for the academy to remain.

By public knowledge I mean get the message across. Take one look on this forum or the CT comments and you will see a very small percentage of people think it is a done deal. Most think it is down to SISU and are poised to point the finger at them if and when an announcement is made.

If true then the trust need to make sure that message is public knowledge.

Good statement. Glad to see it addresses both sides. We need to establish if the door truly is still open or if it is a 'CCFC can still buy Higgs half' type of open door. If it can be established that staying long term at Higgs is an option available to the club then pressure needs to be...

Nope, try again.

Why? That is 13,500 home capacity. How many times this season have we had more home fans than that?

It was an example of the CT putting a negative spin where CCFC are concerned. There has been several articles a day saying Mowbray is going yet the club have said, on more than one occasion, no approach has been made. Now it turns out another club have given permission for their manager to be...

So without knowing a single one of the 17 points you have decided they are unreasonable?

No I'm saying Simon had a conversation with Sharp and then relayed his recollection of it in a video on the CT website. He probably wasn't expecting for someone such as yourself to take it as absolute undeniable proof that it is in no way possible for CCFC and CRFC to groundshare at the Butts...

The 17 points is for the Ricoh isn't it? Not the academy.

Couple of questions spring to mind. How long was the original contract with Higgs? Was the 12 month rolling contract proposed by Higgs or SISU?

Also worth point out the video is not an unedited video of Simon interviewing Sharp. Its Simon talking about what was said in a conversation with him, not that the Telegraph ever spin things to look bad for the club. Has Mowbray been announced as Rotherham's new manager yet?

But why is the current deal now suddenly a problem? Its almost as if its a convenient stick to bash SISU with. When we moved back on the new deal PWKH said "“The Trustees are glad that a satisfactory end has been brought to this chapter in the centre’s life and that they can now continue to...

At no point does he say it can never be expanded. So once again I would say 15K is fine to start and lets see what expansion is allowed for in the plans. To say it is a non-starter indicates that there is no possibility of a groundshare at the Butts. That's clearly a possibility as John Sharp...

probably more a sitcom but Mrs Brown - don't find it funny in the slightest. Miranda Hart - just no, not funny in anything.

This is the type of thing that frustrates me. Why do we so often see post like this (not to single you two out) rather than peoples primary concern being the future of the club. I support CCFC, not SISU, Higgs, CCC, Wasps, CSF, ACL or anyone else. I want what is best for the club. There is an...

Common sense I would have thought. It may very well be the case that it doesn't move forward at all. Or maybe we'll see some plans and decide it is totally unsuitable. Or we could see plans and it be the ground we all want.

Well he's right isn't he? We have no need for a 25K stadium at present. He also says the site is capable of having a 25K stadium so we need to see the plans and details of how quickly and at what expense that expansion could take place if needed. 25K might be too big now, doesn't mean it will...

At no point does it say 15K maximum. It says they're talking about 15K and 25K is possible. Personally I'd rather wait and see some plans or further details rather than declaring the whole project dead. You said it was a non-starter. That's just factually wrong, CRFC state it has got as far as...