Search results

Couldn't believe that. The bloke had admitted it and they didn't want to start a case unless the kids picked him out of an ID parade.

I would imagine they will be saying the manner in which CCC conducted the sale was incorrect and did not achieve best value for taxpayers. They could also argue that the sale is below market price therefore impacting negatively on them as a private sector company. Even if they win hands down is...

They might be named but what chance is there, in the unlikely event SISU win, of Wasps being impacted? The deal can't be unwound now. Any compensation or other penalty will be for CCC to deal with. Why not? Its not particularly unusual for 2 parties working together while having ongoing legal...

So when there was the dispute about the bill for maintenance equipment and it was claimed it couldn't possibly be down to Higgs Trust being vindictive as the AHC and AHT were independent of each other that was false?

He's using the word wrong anyway. You're supposed to put it in capitals at the end of a sentence FACT

Wonder if the unforeseen circumstances are the FL finally putting their foot down.

Broadstreet would be cheaper wouldn't it? For a start would Broadstreet charge them £400K for the land. Also there is already existing rugby facilities at broadstreet and Wasps have spent money to have the facilities improved and pitches laid. The planning at the moment is only 2 years as it is...

Are the names and numbers on the back blue? If so it really negates the complaints about the back being white.

Don't see any reason not to permanently base at Broadstreet.

Why can they not stay at broadstreet permanently? That seems to make perfect sense to me. They will have a lot of what they need already in place, the extra facilities would be of benefit to others and it could increase rather than decrease the community offering.

Wasps and CCFC have clearly been in communication with each other. I would expect Wasps to just say to CCFC, 'we're considering the Higgs as a training centre, would that cause you problems?'.

Higgs are saying what can and can't be done, does that not mean they are still involved?

You've made a big leap from what Anderson actually said. He just said that the club were prepared to move from Ryton to Higgs to show commitment to the city.

This is speculative as I haven't read their rules and regs but an argument could certainly be made that the sale process did not maximise the return to the charity. In terms of what is currently happening at Higgs by their own admission the community offering at Higgs will be reduced if and...

If the charity are no longer owners or operators of the Higgs Centre then why is it understandable they put clauses in case purely to be vindictive to the football club? What difference would it now make to them if CCFC stay or go? And lets not kid ourselves that Higgs are shy of taking legal...

A ban seems a bit over the top.

How would that have worked? If we were liquidated we'd be lucky to start in the same division as Sphinx!

I'm not saying they've got a valid case or any chance of victory. What I'm saying is anyone can take legal action on anything they want. CCC suddenly seem very keen for the legal action to stop. If SISU are no longer connected to the club in any way what would be stopping them continuing legal...

Before anyone gets party invites I still haven't had a letter and car sticker!

So if SISU are prepared to continue the existing court action why would anyone think they would hesitate to undertake further legal action irrespective of if they were still the clubs owners or not.