Search results

Terrific game at Newcastle. The pace of it is unbelievable and a great goal to win it

His brother Laurent would be a good signing

In the very cold weather they might do that a bit unless Ryton has got under soil heating

Team at Blackburn, interesting that Shepherd is on the bench here too. Wonder if that's with a view to him having some first team game time on Saturday?

Left back cover sorted. 🙌🏻

Torp is the highest scoring midfielder in the league

✍🏻

Croydon isn't

Yes I'd like to see him being more demanding. Rudi has had a lot of criticism recently but you can't deny he constantly wants to try and get on the ball.

You can sometimes see in his body language that doubt - I don't think it necessarily helps if there is a big groan when he tries something, other than a safe pass, which doesn't come off.

Your mates at the council lost, get over it. The grand plan to milk the club for rent for 50 years failed.

The concepts of defenders / midfielders / forwards are all grounded in 4-4-2 thinking - the game is a lot more fluid now

It wasn't rent free - it states in the story that the club would pay ACL's costs for staging a match on a pass through basis. Some of those costs would typically be theoretically covered by rent.

Paul Telfer played on the right of midfield for us

I don't think it's a major criticism of Esse that he can't fulfil a role previously undertaken by one of the best young English players about TBH

Interesting reading Glasner's comments on him. It appears that Palace want to use him as a 10 but he's not quite at the level of Eze as yet. It sounds like he expects him to be used wide here but it's also good to know that he potentially could play as a 10.

Last season Paterson helps us make the play offs This season Wilson helps us get promoted Next season Maddison keeps us up

I can only remember him scoring one or two headers tbh

Is there a song to be made based on Bang Bang by BA Robertson?

Simms has managed to do that in less than half the minutes played that Moore has 905 v 1917