Search results

He also said a lot of those players were free agents who were reluctant to commit before the window closes so we could still pick up a couple even if they aren't in today.

I love the way they count down to the window closing and then immediately tell you singings can come through after that anyway.

Signing imminent then :D

There may be more to that than you think. Pop writers tend to reuse certain progressions, a lot, so that a new song sounds like one you've heard before.

I thought Bigi did alright last night. His biggest problem seems to be trying to hit massive crossfield passes, if his success rate on those doesn't increase then the simple solution is just not to attempt them.

Tim's on a roll now, that's another excellent letter and raises some serious questions which I'm sure the CT will be following up on :angelic: Said before that there's a reason the plans have been split into two and we're starting to see why now.

I need to read threads more carefully. All morning I've thought we've been looking at signing a Russian!

I would have thought they would have event insurance so the costs for the abandoned game would be covered. Even if they don't at the very least I'd expect a discount.

Sounds good to me. We could use a bit more physicality in the side.

That's the problem. They're allowed to play a load of over age players so when, for example, Norwich get a sniff of a Wembley final why wouldn't they stack the team up. If the point of it is they have kids that need games make them play kids. Saying that given the age of our side what...

what exactly are the rules in this competition if Norwich and Leicester have players in their late 20s?

don't know where the pic is from but its what he said on CWR after the match.

Sounds like the third is someone out of contract as he said it might not happen until after the window closes.

Why would he be playing in this tonight if he's off tomorrow?

Looks like we're concentrating on the league.

Which part of the rules would be a problem?

The FL can use their discretion. SISU can claim they had nowhere in the city to play and the FL forced them out of business. It's not like SISU need much chance of winning to go to court. The FL in the past have stated they have no money to fight a court case as the reason they don't do more...

One thing nobody seems to be accounting for is the likelihood of legal action by SISU against the FL if they kick us out. The FL will be desperate to avoid that so are likely to agree to pretty much anything.

It always used to be the case that unless you went looking for trouble you were generally OK. Isn't like that anymore, only have to look at someone the wrong way and it can all kick off. People complain that nobody jumps in to help these days but its one thing to jump in when its blokes using...

Any idea what sort of standard their team will be? Is this a match we should be winning or is it going to be a repeat of the Norwich game?