Search results

On the bright side we'll be able to move to the Butts.

Can we keep it to the original date, if they don't turn up we might scrape a 0-0.

That sounded like someone who isn't going to be in the job by the next game. Question is will anyone sack him, does Fisher care enough to do it. Then we would probably end up with Oggy. At the very least they need to come out and say Venus isn't getting it permanently and the search is on. Get...

This a player who averages 0.18 goals a game and had one season in L1 scoring 2 in 37 not bloody Messi.

At any other club you can't imagine Venus still being manager in the morning. Have we got enough staff left to have a caretaker? We'll probably end up with Fisher. What doesn't make sense is when we were starting to improve the players were commenting about having the same system every week and...

More likely that at 3-0 up they could ease off for the second 45

The comment that keeps getting repeated on BBC is that we don't look interested and have no desire whatsoever. That's very worrying. Can't put that down to a bad day at the office.

"Coventry don't look like they have anything to offer"

Another low point. Very telling that the BBC said our players ambled out for the second half like they couldn't care less.

Thank god none of the streams worked.

Don't worry chaps, we're concentrating on the league.

Could do with avoiding a replay as its been said these sort of games lose us money at the Ricoh. Expect we'll go with the best side we can, we aren't good enough to be resting players. Will be a tough game but hopefully we'll sneak it.

I must be missing something then as in the Strutt and Parker valuation report dated 23 April 2015 it explicitly states that the valuation is the market value they would expect a buyer to pay on that date.

How do the JRs cost Wasps time or money?

From the valuation report:

So you're saying the independent valuation carried out to enable the lease to act as security for the bonds doesn't reflect the true value of the lease but is a number that has been arrived at for accounting purposes? Are you suggesting the true value is less and the bond holders don't actually...

That would, in my opinion, mean the council's valuation would be classed as an error of fact.

A JR isn't just on the grounds of legality, you can have followed the letter of the law but still lose a JR. Unless I've missed something what OSB has said is the figure Wasps paid is the value of ACL which is not the same as the lease. However that doesn't mean the valuation of the lease...

If the club is linked I certainly hope there's no suggestion they have done anything to cover it up as it starting to be suggested elsewhere.

What evidence can CCC give to show they maximised the return for the taxpayer? There are certainly questions around the value of the lease given the price Wasps paid for ACL and the lease extension compared to the lease valuation immediately after. If the £48.5m valuation of the lease stands up...