Search results

Well at least things are looking rosy off the pitch. Happy Christmas everyone.

I know. ;)

We're 2-0 up?? WTAF!!!

I wish people would actually say there's been a goal. How am I supposed to deduce we have scored from 'Get the f**k in, Luke Thomas again?'

I'm not talking in term of statements though, I am talking about within the actual agreement when it was drawn up.

Must be costing them a pretty penny in legal fees too.

You try telling that to some people.

The simplest analogy is I think, that we want to get rid of Sisu, but we don't want to get rid of Coventry City Football Club.

Yes, I agree. It is not worth arguing over. The club is getting all the negativity though because of the owners of the club.

Yeah. We need clearly paint the picture that Coventry City Football Club are not Sisu, although they may well be Sisu's football plaything, to play around with and kick about. We need to portray CCFC as the victim.

I get that.Sometimes though I think that it is just laziness though rather than not grasping. Sisu own the club, so some just put club when they in fact mean owners. I agree many don't get it at all though.

He didn't have the greatest voice, but it was so distinctive and he had great inflection.

I think the council HAVE to get involved. I remember saying at the time of the Wasps deal that a caveat had to be made whereby Coventry City FC were guaranteed playing rights at the Ricoh too. If it's a 250 lease to Wasps it had to be a 250 year guarantee to Coventry City as well.

Yeah. Crazy!! if Wasps aren't to blame how can Coventry City be?

Can only guess they think CCFC is Sisu even though the option of Sisu is up there too. If so, that is incredibly dense

Am I being a bit thick here? How have 7% said it's CCFC's fault?

That's bloody ridiculous! Surely it's much more than 74%!

I'll ask James and get back to you.