Search results

Think they have someone new starting soon or recently started who should sort all that out.

Its been mentioned before, there was a reason it couldn't happen - can't remember what though, don't think it has been let to anyone else. There's a second, empty, unit on the opposite side of the Ricoh (if you walk through between the ground and the exhibition hall its at the other end).

Bit strange for a paper that won't run a save the academy campaign as its down to the fans to do that kind of thing.

You close the shop down, not sure we want to force the closure of the club!

Unlike our new ground theirs is currently under construction.

Would love to predict a win but even saying we'll score a goal seems optimistic at the moment!

That's exactly the problem. You'll never get a total boycott so it won't gain any attention any further than the local area. Certainly not to the point of making SISU take notice. Said it before, the only way SISU are going is if they are presented with a viable exit strategy.

And they'd just paid for a new pitch at Sixfields!

They do indeed play in Coventry now but that wasn't the question.

And for how many years since 1866 were they not playing either in London, or a temporary home close to London?

Just having a look at these. If you hand the car back at the end of the 3 years, assuming you're OK on mileage and damage, do you just get a new car for a similar monthly payment? Seems a decent deal if you want a new car every 3 years.

Maybe this is the news they're trying to bury :D

I got that reply when I asked Simon if the Telegraph could campaign to save the academy. Apparently its down to the fans not the paper to lead a campaign.

That's the key. If we'd moved and 'done a Leicester', and of course didn't have Wasps logos plastered everywhere, we'd love the place. Its the memories of the good times people miss, just they associate them with HR.

Did anyone watch this. It was appalling, how on earth it ever made it to air is beyond me. Clearly made with an agenda but despite their best efforts couldn't come up with any actual evidence to support their claims. By what I am sure is complete coincidence there was also an anti-corbyn piece...

So you really think when Kieran left the club there was an agreement for him to put out false information for 3.5 months after which he could then openly say anything he wanted?

yes but we're not talking about him being gagged are we. we're talking about him making statements after he has left the club. he didn't have to say anything and if he couldn't contractually why is he now?

Reading between the lines on twitter it sounds like the Telegraph may have been banned from the club.

I can't see why he would make shit up. But then I didn't think there was a reason for him to make up things about the two potential stadium sites he was talking about after he had left the club. I agree, but in that scenario wouldn't you expect him to say he won't deal with SISU at all? Not...

So lets say year 1 needs £500K put in for the club just to survive. Where does that come from? I'd be up for fan ownership and I'd happily buy shares but I struggle to see how it can work with our financial situation.