Search results

Someone with a lot of patience has recreated it in Lego.

I've been wondering that but thought I was being stupid as nobody seemed to question it! Tried google and all I got was a piece about West Ham not being able to sink their pitch as there's radioactive waste under the olympic stadium!

Is the £2m you're referring to there the £1.8m direct payment from CCFC to ACL? That's an additional amount not a total isn't it? Its just taking one line from the completion report and ignoring everything else.

Seeing as you can't use google:

Which bit? Most of it is in the clubs accounts or the SBT website. The company Richardson engaged for the project purchased the land of British Gas, Richardson negotiated the deal with Tesco but the company sold the land to CCC, I think for £20m, and they flipped it to Tesco for £60m. When ACL...

Think you're overcomplicating it OSB. At the moment we are at an impasse with Wasps refusing to talk to CCFC. If Collins, or anyone else, can kick talks back into action then we will be better off than we are now. You can call it mediation or whatever you like but as a start all that really...

The amount put in by the club was netted off to the figure Higgs paid however Higgs didn't pay all in cash. Money spent in some of the early stages, when Richardson was trying to get the project off the ground, never seemed to get counted. I guess an arbitrary day one was picked and costs...

I buy it, to a certain extent, being an excuse when its just Fisher but why would Jon Sharp not say it was rubbish? Why don't CCC come out and say we support it 100% and will do everything we can to help? Why don't the CT and SBT get right behind it as well. Said it before, call Fishers bluff...

GhostWatch scared the crap out of me when that was shown, I was in halls at uni so would have been 92.

There's plenty of questions and doubts about what Wasps have done, just because they have actually done something doesn't mean they should get a free pass. The no negative impact to CCFC that Grendel points out should be getting massively pushed at Wasps and CCC by the CT. Off the top of my...

Originally the club was supposed to get 50% of the freehold however CCC went back on that and instead the club got 50% of ACL but ACL had to pay £21m to CCC for the lease and CCFC had to pay £1.2m a year in rent.

The OP can't be genuine can it?

Maton is hardly in a position to be lecturing anyone on anything. The guy is clueless and blocks anyone who dares ask him a question.

Very true, would depend on if and how quickly it could be expanded if required.

At the very least if he talks to both sides we might find out what Wasps will offer. That alone might start to move things forward as with them refusing to talk to the club at the moment its hard to see anything getting resolved.

What legal action is this between CCFC and Wasps? And why is it that many other businesses involved in legal action can still happily manage to deal with each other? Based on what evidence? Getting your excuses in early.

Given the situation we're in at the moment a 15K ground that we can fill a few times a season might be a better option. We need to see the business plan for that compared to staying at the Ricoh. Nothing to say we have to stay there forever and can't move or expand in the future if the demand...