Search results

Indeed they do and the documents that show that policy are available online yet the CT deny that's what they do. That's what I do. The CT articles are either things they've totally made up or are hours, if not days, behind here. You're not going to miss any news if you keep an eye on the forums.

Basically what stupot said. The stewards had obviously been told not to react when provoked so you had people giving the grief the whole match. Not sure if they bypassed the JSB section when they were making their way round or not. I think the protest organisers need to be careful they don't...

So the selling club agrees personal terms for the player being sold?

And how are you getting to the PL to get that money? Remember there's plenty of teams in the championship happy to chuck millions a season at a promotion push.

Don't particularly want it to be happy clappy but equally how often do we see fighting in the stands? Is it coincidence it happened at that game? And people wandering through the stands in groups and standing at the front with their hoods up and scarves covering their faces would surely unnerve...

I can't see that ever happening unless there's drastic changes to the way football runs in this country. The likes of Wimbledon and Portsmouth have the same problem. Wimbledon only broke even in their last accounts as they got Liverpool in the cup and it was televised. Pompey have by far the...

Hadn't he already been sold for £800K to someone else last week? He's a good player but some of these kids need to realise that when they're so young a couple of years of regular first team football is better for them in the long term.

The thing that first put peoples backs up was that when he used to post on here regularly any talk of the CT being in league with the council or Wasps and he'd make out it was tin foil hat territory. Of course later on at a council ethics hearing it turned out the CT had done a deal with CCC to...

Whatever is planned hopefully its for after the game or certainly not disrupting the game. With a new manager, potentially 3 new players out there and off the back of the first half decent result in months it would be nice to see everyone get behind the team for 90 mins. Have to say I didn't...

Great effort. What did you start off doing. I seem to always make the same mistake, don't make my plans realistic. Start off well for a few weeks and then it all falls apart.

I don't know why people find this concept so hard to understand. Think of it in terms of selling your house. You might not have your house on the market, therefore it is 'not for sale' but if someone knocked on the door and made you an offer you'd consider it and if their offer was acceptable to...

I love how the CT blatantly click bait and then get all sulky if anyone calls them out on it.

In a word no. Its something I've mentioned many times, its all well and good saying SISU should walk on the assumption someone else will come in but other than a rehash of SISU's original plan (pump some money in and hope for promotion) what else could a new owner do? I can't see how we can...

In terms of where it was paid from some of it never really existed in a sense. There was debt from pre-SISU years that stayed on the books but SISU didn't pay out on it (if that makes sense). From what OSB has said the original investments from the SISU funds is likely to have been written down...

IMO £15m they'd rip your hand off, £10m would be given serious consideration.

They've probably made it up so they can complain later on that it hasn't happened rather than be happy that we've already signed 3 players.

SISU came in December 2007. Losses to May 2004 were £8.2m, May 2005 was 0.9m, May 2006 was 3.3m and May 2007 was 4.3m according to this: Coventry City Football Club Ltd | The Political Economy of Football The accounts to 31st May 2005 have some interesting comments in them from Paul Fletcher

Depends if you're looking at it from a business perspective or a fan perspective. If SISU want us to break even they won't care if we have to sell someone just that the numbers add up at the end of the year. From our point of view we would want to be breaking even without the need to sell...

£6m a year I think when they arrived. Now allegedly close to break even but that seems to involve selling a player every year.

If that's the case then it has to be ACL no longer giving us the service. There's no other reason it would be stopped.