Search results

And so were ACL. They're both culpable for our plight. Both.

Post 147: They (ACL) can either say "have the stadium" or something similar. They. i.e. ACL Post 152: "If it keeps Coventry City in Coventry then yes." Which was in answer to your direct question. If it meant we stayed in Cov then I would accept that, better than going out of the City, for...

If I had a STRAIGHT CHOICE. Sixfields or playing at a SISU owned Ricoh then I would choose the Ricoh. I never said we should give them the Ricoh for nothing, you might want to actually read what I did right. I said who knows what options ACL have to entice them to stay. Believe it or not...

I'm far from happy with it. However, he seems quite happy to make stuff up. Nothing I can do about that. I'm done with trying to reason with him.

They moved us out of Cov because ACL refused to deal with them. Mutton refused to deal with them. Idiots wrote to the Council begging not to deal with them. And yet again, you put words into my mouth. Where have I said "it's a good move for them"?

What?! And you seem happy to liquidate and start again. Surely you realise that we would be "even non league"? And why am I happy with being in L1? Where have I said "I AM HAPPY BEING IN LEAGUE ONE BECAUSE I THINK SISU ARE WIZARD"?

I agree 100%. I won't be going to Sixfields either.

How do you work that out. Moving OUT OF THE FUCKING CITY is dying from a thousand cuts. Staying in the City in the Ricoh is what this football club needs to survive. I'm not backing SISU and I never have. I'm saying I would be prepared to have them own the Ricoh if it meant we stayed in the...

So it's just me who has that "Saturday afternoon routine" then? If you get liquidation then I hope you're happy with your "community asset". You could always go to the annual ACL AGMs and cheer them along and the Council Committees in the Town Hall. Beats going to football, eh? You'll be...

I'm talking about ACL.

Well, there you go.

Actually, no I don't agree. I think this is now easier for them. Reject the CVA and they will be heroes to many, many people.

If it keeps Coventry City in Coventry then yes.

They could well do that.

That "twist" is up to ACL. They can either say "have the stadium" or something similar. Or they can try and keep into admin as a groundshare cannot go ahead while we are in admin. It's in the lap of the Gods, PWKH and Ann Lucas.

Well "they have to go and now" isn't going to happen. So, the most important thing is to stay in the City regardless of how we make that happen. Nothing else matters.

Fair enough. Do you not think though that staying at the Ricoh is the most important thing for Coventry City, regardless of how that goal is achieved?

No, not one bit. But if it was a straight choice of him or going to Northampton for at least three years then I would take my chances with Richardson. There's at least a chance that he could sell it on while staying in the City. With our current situation then is zero chance of a buyer...

Their plaything? Now, this is the hysteria I was talking about, which many people are happy to buy into along with CCC. What is happening now is what you want. There is no other way. SISU are not getting their hands on the stadium so you and ACL are the victors.

So you'll be celebrating then today? I wonder if your morals stretch farther than the "community asset"?