Search results

Don't disagree. But I guess they are like any owner - and I'm including any future custodians - they want a piece of the action.

What a mess. The kit and the situation. Don't like it so I'll save myself a bit.

The Council put in roughly 10% of the cost of the complex. Not a bad return.

Seems not. The FL don't seem to give a toss and SISU seem prepared to leave ACL to sink or swim. I'm just hoping (though I still think it's a long shot) that common sense will prevail and a deal will be struck. The most important thing at the moment is to stay in Coventry.

While they own the football club and refuse to talk to any potential purchasers then yes, unfortunately we are reliant on SISU.

As I've said in the past, if the US Government and the Taliban can talk to each other then I'm sure ACL and SISU can.

If we are at the Ricoh then I'm there. For me the important thing was to stay in Coventry, which is it is achieved will mean that I'll get my ST. If we move to Sixfields then I won't. SISU still being in charge if we do return to the Ricoh won't make any difference for me, though others feel...

Maybe the Trust need to change their message then?

Yep, can't argue with that. As I said each to their own. IMportant thing for me and my family is that they stay in Coventry. If they do, then we will continue to attend. If they move we won''t. Really is that simple for me. Appreciate that others feel different though.

White. No dye needed.

Personally, the three of us have decided not to renew if we are at Sixfields. However, we will renew like a shot if we are the Ricoh. I think the important thing is to stay in the city. Concentrate on the owners once that has been achieved. The Trust's message is currently 'Keep Cov in...

My Dad said to me that 350 have been sold. Not sure how he knows that or where he has heard it from.

I won’t – and can’t – disagree with you on the way SISU have conducted themselves over the rent issue. My view, as is well known, is that ACL take a large slice of blame too due to the unrealistic and unsustainable rent charged in the first place. Along with Richardson, of course. As if we’d...

Not strictly true. Robinson approached ACL in December 2005 stating the club couldn't afford the rent. Not sure why it wasn't pursued then. And, at that time, we'd only been in the stadium four months, so it seems there certainly was a problem with the business model from the outset...

Positive for me would be playing at the Ricoh. I think that's the most important goal. Getting rid of SISU can wait until we're back in the City. Just my opinion.

Seems like you were party to whatever was said too.

Something's wrong, apparently... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiNQEriUP3Q

Yeah, whatever.

Be careful you don't walk into anything. You should have put some eye holes in.

I think they care as long as they get paid.