Search results

Assume he was referring to Anderson who tried to draw a line under past actions and start talks only for Wasps to pull out of talks regarding the Ricoh and CSF to pull out of talks regarding HIggs. Anderson, after he had left, commented that he was looking to take over a club. You could...

I'll dig the quote out later but to paraphrase it was that CCFC had full knowledge of the CU move and it wouldn't impact on any future groundshare with CCFC.

IMO its less to do with the rent, even if you assume we could get a new deal at the same rent, and more to do with the rapidly spiralling costs and poor treatment of the club and its fans. Rent is only part of the cost of playing at the Ricoh. Also people need to stop falling into the trap of...

Given what Sharp said when the Cov Utd move to the Butts was announced I wouldn't bet on them still being there in the unlikely event we move in.

You are assuming that Cov Bears and Cov Utd will still play there. Neither of those are a certainty. What other football team plays there?

What could possibly give you that idea

The football club. And that's been the case since long before SISU arrived.

Its the same with all sorts of crime, not just terrorism. The police know who these people are but the burden of proof is so high and sentences so light they can do little. Obviously not in the same category but watch shows like Traffic Cops where they have the crimes on camera and then at the...

Also Sharp

Good offer, doubt it will tempt along many though unfortunately.

Doesn't really change anything for me really this statement. I still work on the basis that until the work starts I'm not assuming anything but would urge everyone to get 100% behind Fisher. Give him enough rope ...

Depends on the figures surely. 50% of £5 is better than 100% of £1.

Pretty much all the local media were reporting it to be a very close vote. Certainly the CT and CWR.

You don't think he's an idiot but you think he's spending time evaluating a groundshare with CCFC while insisting on a playing surface we couldn't use?

You don't need to, that's not what he's said. He's selected his language very precisely. As long as he and CRFC only deal with the club he's not dealing with SISU even if they are pulling the strings in the background. Carefully selected wording so he doesn't piss off the council if a plan not...

What has always appeared odd to me was that going in to the meeting it was said to be very close. Then there was a meeting, with Wasps in attendance, at which no minutes or record of any sort was kept. After that it was suddenly a unanimous vote. What the hell happened in that meeting?

sub lease at a guess.

I doubt Sharp is an idiot so if one of the options under consideration is CCFC playing there he will be aware of the pitch requirements. SISU don't need to leave for them not to be involved at least technically. The precise way he's phrased it, several times now, makes me think it is deliberate.

not if CRFC have 51% of the prop co

Exactly, set up a joint venture prop co owned by Otium and CRFC. He's not dealing with SISU then.