Search results

"Basically it is impossible to fairly and impartially judge AT unless he does get some signings. You yourself have said on here at some point, we need at least 7 including 3 strikers." So if he does not get these signings (as I say I think it should be more) that you yourself have said we...

he says earmarked, they are the 5 people AT earmarked and it is a case of getting them before we can :)

Sorry Duffy but unfortunately this is not a kangaroo court Case for prosecution (or is that persecution) according to you, no matter what funding players or support the manager is given he will fail Evidence presented for this none as despite the managers first 10 games in charge since then...

In reality though, you coulf throw that jibe to any manager who takes the helm, that they have the easiest job in the world. As, as you rightly point out the owners setup for failure. The only way this debate will ever end is if they set up for success and get failure. Like with Coleman.

Do you think Dennis wise will come here Duffy.

Are you refering to the various sisu board members here or AT.

Interesting. Will see if I can find it. I suppose if this is what he said he could always turn round and say. In light of the finances. They are giving me the best backing they possibly can.......

So with what we know about SISU If AT says that's it I have had enough I will walk. Do you think that this will change SISU's approach. Or do you think it will just leave us with out a manager. Do you want him to do this to try and change SISU? I guess it is a tough one what is AT's role be...

When did AT make this I will quit comment and what did he actually say? Has anyone still got a link to the original story, I missed it completely? I think he would be more sensible just saying if they give me no signings as it stands, I will do my best to keep the club up but as you have seen...

Maybe I dont understand it, but I take that to be a we can't talk about specific clubs but yes?

Lord I am sure it did, you, Nick, Kduffy and Torch so far. However Duffy technically yours was shared so not as special.

By the above info from Astute though, it seems to always be the case Football has its own rules :)

My tiny knowledge of civil action in terms of the recovary of debts, HMRC and the banks takes precedence over everybody else. They are always top of the pecking order then all other creditors follow in an agreed schedule as set out by the adminstrators. The creditors fight out where they come in...

However just a thought it may not be the worst case scenario. The worst case scenario could be SISU fail to acquire a share of the stadium. They also fail to get the rent reduced or a share of catering etc... They then as oppose to going the Admin/Liquidation route decide the club need to run...

Just for my understanding are the accounts not published because SISU have not submitted the books

Yes sorry I dont think I explained myself clearly, that is what I am saying. SISU know the budget yet they are not submitting it and are using it as a bargaining tool. Like they are doingwith the rent.

I agree BSB. However a proper debate to me is when someone makes a comment such as "You want liquidation and that is f'ing stupid" (not aimed at me I might add) You then try to get to the bottom of what would liquidation actually mean for the club. To see if this statemnt is villified or...