Search results

He means sex.

Nope. They look more like a glass of Prosecco while watching Love Island and then straight down the discotheque for a bit of a boogie type couple.

Sorry. I cannot fancy someone called Keith.

Very fair comment.

Well, that's my thinking too. I certainly don't think we have played at all to Chaplin's strengths, as poor as he may have been.

We've got Chaplin. There is seemingly no way out of that deal, so we need to bring players in who can play alongside him. The Clarke-Harris/Chaplin combination is clearly not working.

We get the right players around him, Bayliss is nothing but an asset to this club. If it were me, I'd only sell him if we had to sell him and had no choice in the matter.

More than that. Prior to the 5 game winning streak we were not very good. Fernando is right. You are usually a very good poster, but I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this, Steve. This season as a whole (not just the last few games) ..... Doyle- Poor Shipley - Poor JCH - Poor Chaplin -...

But I don't think we Are carrying him. How can we be carrying him when the whole side is playing badly? In the last two or three games just about every single player has been getting ratings of 5 or lower from us the fans. That's not carrying anyone. That's the whole side playing badly.

Thing is, the whole team is playing badly. Doesn't that point to a bigger and wider problem than Tom Bayliss?

Never ever drive if I had even as much a half lager shandy. Am totally for the no alcohol at all policy.

6 away defeats in a row too.

You would expect us to dig deep, roll our sleeves up and start fighting wouldn't you.

I've been saying all season, that when you see the teams line up at the start of the game, the opposition always seem taller, bulkier and bigger than us. We do seem quite a slight side. The other thing is, when we are away (and sometimes at home) we can be very defensive. Trouble is our...

I have been disappointed with Chaplin, but a partnership with JCH clearly hasn't worked at all and I would like to see how good he could be with the right striker playing alongside of him. JCH has been poor this season and the pair don't seem to even be on the same wavelength. Chaplin may well...

Thing is, it shouldn't matter about losing in 9 prior visits. Different players, different managers, different systems, over a period of a number of years. It's not like 9 games for Watford at Man City where Man City would always be the outright favourites year upon year, upon year. Shrewsbury...

We can wait for Geoff Foster to ask, but it will be a very, very long wait.

Somewhere just after a plummet.

Surely that's the physio isn't it?

Yep, you have to wonder. Something is seemingly not right. If there is a rift it's more often than not that the manager is the one to fall on his sword. Don't know how true this is, but when I hear of rifts I always begin to doubt if some injured players are actually injured.