Search results

From what I can make out Supporters Direct told the trust he was too extreme and hence the JHW was formed yet there is clearly very little separation. It was almost comical at the event the Trust held regarding fan ownership. You had supporters direct and the chap from Pompey talking about how...

Interesting to see the accounts fisherbaiter follows and the likes & retweets he's given out.

The Trust are beyond a joke now, we're at a point where they are actively harming our chances of having a football club next season. I posted earlier, as did others, that the trust would rather the club ceased to exist than put the slightest bit of pressure on anyone other than SISU and CJ...

No stone left unturned!

So basically the Ricoh put something in place under the guise of safety, fans and the club complained and the police told them to stop being dicks and change it back.

Is a Norway-style deal even an option, they don't seem very keen on letting us in!

Its really that simple. Not sure how the trust manage to make it so complicated. By far the biggest priority is still having a club next season. Everything else can wait.

It reads exactly like that when the trust refuse to have their name alongside other fans groups on a statement asking for nothing more than talks to be held with a view to us still having somewhere to play next season.

So to simplify if we assume that Joy won't suddenly stop the legals the trust would rather the club ceased to exist than put the slightest bit of pressure on Wasps to come to the table and agree a short term extension at the Ricoh, and that is supposed to be the representative view of the...

Out of interest why would the trust back it with that removed? If you remove that sentence it doesn't make Sepalla stop the legals so it creates an ambiguous area that the likes of Wasps can use to the clubs disadvantage. We need talks to happen now so we have a stadium to play in next season...

If you look at the twitter accounts of some of the board members its just them, the chap behind the Jimmy Hill Way (who even Supporters Direct said was too extreme and needed to be distanced from the trust) and Armybike (remember him?) telling each other they're right and everyone else is wrong.

How can they object to that? All its saying is sit down and talk so there's a chance the club has somewhere to play next season. The trust are now positioning themselves as in opposition to securing the future of the club and every other fans group.

And they continually claim to be the biggest fans group off the back of asking people for a quid years ago. Nick has got as much claim to leading the biggest fans group as they have.

That's an absolute disgrace from the Trust. I know there are some good people who try hard on there but those people are clearly being overruled and should be giving serious thought to handing in their resignations.

I wasn't expecting much when I contacted them to be honest but the fact that as a member of the public you can't even register a complaint against the behaviour of your own local council is pretty shocking even going off my already low expectations.

Clearly you can: "Also in attendance and offered the opportunity to support were The Sky Blue Trust, though their board subsequently decided they did not wish to commit to the entire statement"

As far as I can tell from speaking to the local government ombudsman there is no system in place for the electorate to even register a complaint about elected officials demonstrably lying to the electorate let alone any chance of them receiving any disciplinary action over it.

Or you could just look at one of the threads on here where that has been discussed previously. Blaze live on Freeview tonight

Not sure sold is the word i'd use.