Search results

Had one sitting behind me in block 31. Baker was apparently a lazy ****** At one point he berated him for not going for a ball that "was his" and even his mate had to point out that the defender was 10 yards closer to the ball. Don't you just luv em.....

When a balloon landed near me, I demanded to see its fire certificate!

I'm really struggling to understand how you can ask this question, when it's placed right next to your question to SkyBlueSwiss.

But we are told that we are not in administration. A subsidiary company that has no assets is in administration. TF said so.

That's fair enough. A little earlier though, you seemed happy to give the Higgs share / your £1k (my interpretation) to the club, with no mention of knowing "exactly what the intention is".

But wouldn't it amount to the same thing?

As I understand it, the SBT is committed to a democratic approach. So if your views were in the majority they would be enacted. If in the minority, they wouldn't. Would you agree with that?

Then why not just give £1k to the club - cut out the middle man?

So, that's a no?

Serious question Torch... If like me you've been a Cov fan as long as you can remember (and that takes me back to the 60's) and you believe that SISU are bad for the club, do you believe that that makes me "anti CCFC" ?

Think you're confusing him with Adam Dent. Rob was/is a true Sky Blue!

Not sure that's true. If "everything" was in administration I'd agree that any interested buyer would come forward. However we're in, what seems increasingly to be, our usual mess. CCFC Ltd is in administration. It probably owns the golden share, but apparently doesn't own any players...

They always do!! Who has lost round 1? Us.

As I recall you've been telling us for years that there would be no interested buyers.

There is something quite impressive in your dogged determination to defend the indefensible.

To be fair, on a pretty depressing day, the "official statement" from TF is the only thing that's made me chuckle :)

I think that just about everyone would agree that trying to negotiate a rent reduction was the right thing to do. For me, the problem was the way they went about it. They started with a strong moral case and a weak legal case, but then massively overplayed their hand and appeared to go out...

I think the point is more that (some) people believe that SISU will not sell the club at a price that anyone would be prepared to pay. Therefore if you believe that the club needs a change of ownership to be able to progress, then sadly administration appears to be the only way forward -...

I'm in London at the moment. I have an 11.00 meeting tomorrow - very tempted to "forget" it and find my way to the court instead. Mind you, it'd probably be a huge anti-climax like most of our big games :(

I think that everyone from every viewpoint on this site seems to agree that for a successful future for the club it's vital that the club owns the stadium. On that basis, wouldn't it be odd if potential buyers of the club weren't trying to establish what sort of deal might be available for...