Search results

Moving from Wycombe to here isn't the initial damage, but it's repeating it which isn't much better. They were there long enough to attract new local fans there as well as uprooting longer standing fans with a move even further from their original base.

If we're dictating censorship rules, please delete all of tony's replies in every thread and make him move to the back of the bus. Cheers.

I don't want Pressley out. Your tone is less apologetic by the post, tony.

People becoming upset about something that affects local teams isn't made invalid if they weren't following the tribulations years ago.

Apology accepted. I assumed you were aware of how football works, clearly not.

I'm not calling for his head. I'm almost not throwing the toys out about people criticising the manager rather than blaming the owners for everything, which is what you've subtly masqueraded your question as.

Don't ask a question with logic that trips you up.

The answer is that there would be plenty of applicants. The evidence is every managerial vacancy that ever happens. Out of interest when people are calling for the owners to leave are you demanding a list of replacements as proof that they exist too or is it only what suits your agenda at any...

Swap that list for your list of new owners.

You realise how petty this is right? There would be applicants because that's how football works and always has. We're not a special case.

He's right, managerial jobs attract a lot of applicants.

There's no job vacancy to queue for. If we didn't have a manager, there would be a host of applicants as there is with any professional club at any time.

That's what you're doing when you ignore the issue of the manager and team and just blame the owners. Criticising Pressley doesn't mean you absolve Sisu of culpability; as woeful as they continue to prove themselves, he shouldn't be getting a free ride when we're doing as poorly as we are either.

We do sell players and replace them on the cheap, but again we're not an exclusive club for this. We're in the third division, it's practically one of the entry requirements.

The point was about the owners.

RFC has to be a group of people taking turns with the account, it can't be a real person.

Can't help but feel it's giving them too much credit by suggesting being shit is part of their masterplan. I reckon they're just shit.

LAST invents arguments and viewpoints to rally against so much he may as well wear a tinfoil hat by law.

There are managers in football who can work with shitty owners, we're hardly an exclusive club in that regard.

Different owners.