Search results

Oh dear what? The criticism is that people haven't turned up for a protest that was "well publicised on social media for days" yet there's literally no mention of it on any of the trusts channels. I'm a trust member and I certainly haven't had an email or any other direct communication about it...

What makes you think people aren't doing something? Maybe its something that doesn't involve a photo op for the Telegraph.

Because the obvious response to posts about a coach to a protest in London is what time do I need to be at the Ricoh for a protest against Wasps you've made no mention of :facepalm:

Maybe you can explain how from those posts, which are the only ones the trust have made, people should have known they needed to book time off work and be at the Ricoh at 9 this morning for a protest against Wasps?

1) Some people are at work at 9:15am 2) It was hardly promoted as a protest against anyone but SISU on social media. From the trust website: From the trust facebook: From the trust twitter:

In an attending all the board meetings, speaking at their events, going into meetings with the EFL capacity.

Yes, for some reason they decided, I say they I think there's only two of them, decided the best place to protest was behind the dug out. Robins didn't agree and said it distracted the players. Johnson went off on him and said he didn't know what he was on about.

Being so secretive just leads to speculation as to why. If they didn't want to be known then stop going to the press. Now we're left guessing who is involved which leads to worries that the likes of Ranson or Wasps are connected to it.

Absolutely fair play to any fan who turned up toady expecting to protest all sides. Why would I applaud the trust? The flaws in this protest were pointed out to them, ie nobody from SISU would pay any attention making it a wasted trip, and the oft-repeated question regarding pressuring all...

'The play', IMO, is to pressure Wasps. But that's been stated over and over again as the most likely route to still having a club and that club playing at the Ricoh next season but has been consistently ignored. Some suggested it was being ignored as there was a fear of upsetting Wasps with...

And this is why the 'do something yourself' response is ridiculous. The trust are supposed to represent fans and have a status that opens doors and gets media coverage. Does anyone really think it 4 or 5 of us off here went up to the council house or the Ricoh we'd have Duggins or anyone from...

I see David 'nothing to do with the trust' Johnson is part of the two man trust team, with Moz, that has gone in for a meeting with the EFL.

Exactly, I don't see how its so hard to understand.

That would be prime CCFC. Sell the club to Hoffman but don't drop the legals and Wasps still refuse to talk.

Do you really not understand the issue people have with the Trust? Today is a good example, as you say it is supposed to be 'targeting all parties'. What has actually happened is a 5 min stop at the council house to wave SISU out banners, wearing SISU out t-shirts while being wished well on...

Just watched the video of them meeting the Wasps chap. No idea who it was, never seen him before, seems Richardson and / or Eastwood didn't deem it important enough to show up. Summary is Wasps point blank refuse to even speak to the club unless the legals are dropped. After Moz had said his...

Why is this becoming an increasingly common response from various posters to things? That and convenient forgetting or claiming to have not ever known about certain things. You asked the question regarding why some fans hold the view they do of the trust but have ignored an entire thread...

According to their website the last letter to Wasps was October 2017. Oddly the letter itself seems to now be missing from the site but I seem to recall it expressed sympathy with Wasps situation.

At least they've all been given the same script. Moz in the Telegraph "The clock is ticking now".