Search results

What is 'operate from' classed as? Because it seems to have been taken by the trust as Sepalla being sat there at a desk everyday yet the only people who have responded to queries have said there is nothing to indicate they are actually physically located there and the trust have to date refused...

But if you have a site operating on open source software these 'attacks' happen on a daily basis. Hard to believe this is the only time anything has flagged up on the trust site so, given that they say nothing was compromised, why the need to make a fuss about it. All a bit suspicious when they...

That is my concern, they've pitched up to the registered address which is unlikely to be where SISU operate from. Look at how many companies are registered to that addresses which a simple google tells you is an office services company. They've then moaned that nobody from SISU is there to...

As with any protest the question I would ask is what is their desired outcome? It won't raise awareness which is the usual reason given, and it risks any publicity being negative. It will get the club in trouble with the EFL with a possible fine which will not be paid by SISU but by the...

You don't even need to look at the accounts to know its bad news. The fact that its quietly slipped out rather than announced with an article in the Telegraph tells you all you need to know.

"Nothing to see here, everything is fine, we don't need the money the football club generates as everything is fantastic. We're the richest club in Europe. Not long until every game is sold out"

Just checked mine. Got nothing setup to hide my location, not connected to a head office or any other remote system. Shows as Clapham and I'm sat in an office in Solihull.

How stupid do they think people are? There is no reason to mention a location whatsoever when announcing something like this but we're expected to believe that the trust innocently published that it was from Kensington, the exact same place they visited last week to protest SISU. I notice...

So if Hoff can do a deal while the legals are still going the legals aren’t an issue preventing a deal being done. No reason for Wasps not to be straight back to the table to negotiate then. They really aren’t intelligent enough to consider the knock on impact of things they say are they...

Was going to post it would be funny if SISU threatened legal action but I fear that may be the hope. Outrage at SISU attacking fans would be a nice distraction.

This is the problem with going public that you’ve made a bid but refusing to say who is involved. Especially when the likes of Dale Evans have previously been in the consortium and Ranson has reappeared.

How are people voting for an option that doesn’t exist?

Bit odd that he says they’re meeting one of the requirements when only a few days ago we were told there was nothing the council could do. We’ve also in a matter of days gone from never spoken to the club about a new stadium, to there was talks but no sites, to talks about a specific site...

And they’re now knocking out tickets for the remaining day half price.

The piece on the trust website and covmad read as if they were written by someone whose knowledge is limited to what they’ve seen on some TV show and has no basis in reality.

If nothing happened why the need to apologise for the inconvenience? The survey is anonymous anyway isn’t it?

Anyone work in data protection / GDPR? There’s consequences to this sort of thing aren’t there.

You could own a player but not have him registered with the PL, that’s 2 separate things isn’t it?

I’ve run it through Google translate: ‘The poll results weren’t what we wanted so we’re going to say we were hacked’

The council less shooting themselves in the foot, more blowing both legs off.