Search results

Have to confess, it came to the super over and I put it on pause and went out and walked the dog to calm down. Oh, snap, stu.

Yeah, fair point.

Must confess I was a bit puzzled that Woakes didn't get to bowl the super over. Massive responsibility on Archer. Felt that Archer was more likely to bowl wides and the odd bad ball and that Woakes would be more economical.

Too much to do now I fear. Hoping Plunkett can whack a few sixes.

Sleazy? Never seen a sleazy bum, apart from when Trump had a financial crash many years a go.

Oh bum. Down to you Stokes.

One more wicket here and it could be game over. These two need to stay in.

Phew, Close, but a poor review and now none left.

What, the norks?

Welcome to Britain.

Except for those looking for a miracle cure.

Yup. No doubt

I think we are going to be well short and all out for about 160-170 at this rate. Needs some Morgan improvisation, or like I said earlier, Stokes or Buttler to wrestle control.

Yup. Think we will lose this as it stands. Need a Buttler, Morgan or Stokes to grab the game by the throat.

Root gone. After a poor swipe previous ball too.

NZ bowling brilliantly though.

Yeah, I think 242 is certainly a lot more than where it should have ended up. Some sloppiness in the field a few missed shy's at the stumps. This total does worry me a bit. Pitch seems a bit slow too.

Yeah, you have to think if there is going to be any bit of movement it will be first thing. Get the feeling Morgan will bat first though if he wins the toss. We haven't seen too much of Buttler with the bat of late, but I get the feeling it might be his day tomorrow if we lose the openers...

Make for a nice Elbow song.

It's nothing angry or annoyance driven, Torch. Just a lack of understanding.