Search results

Well, looks like they've got something in common now.

Ooh, has he done a "Dublin"?

When did you go then?

Can't see a problem with it. It's sitting there empty. It's not like a deal is imminent, is it? And both sides keep banging on about moving on. Seems like ACL are.

Yeah, that was Doncaster who were two goals to the good I think at the time the game was called off. They lost the replayed fixture I think.

Just checked my post and...nope...didn't say it was.

Is "unfettered" the new Buzz Word? Are we only using it because Ann said it?

Fans in differing of opinions shock.

Anyone with a brain can see it's a combination of SISU, ACL, CCC and BR who was the catalyst.

Ah, nice one.

Of course, I don't.

I don't think different. Of course SISU are in for it for themselves - where have I said they're not. So are all owners. Look at the debt United are in because of the Glazers. People buy football clubs to make money. And you’re right, I don’t know what I’m on about sometimes, unlike...

Tried that once. Didn't manage to get it.

I was replying to Astute - who laughably "likes" your post - who said that Joy knows nothing about football. I was saying a lot of owners don't.

That's not true. EDIT: Thanks Stu.

True. They are richer and the clubs they took over were already set up quite nicely, weren't they? My point is regardless of the state of a club, very few owners are "football men".

Well, he must be a pretty crap property developer then if he wants to buy something where he can't develop property. Maybe he was only buying into us because he thought Joe E was a nice bloke? "Nah, Joe. Nothing in it for me. I'm doing it for the kids."

You'll find that most owners know nothing about football. From the Glazers to Tan to SISU.

It seems that all involved seem to "imply" a lot rather than "saying" anything.

Plan Apple?