Search results

You can be the biggest Wasps fan in the city, doesn't have to follow that you're happy to see the football club go under. The reasons you state are exactly why I suggested the trust should be pushing other angles such as the work Sky Blues in the Community does and the economic benefits of...

Exactly, what they are saying now is that they had so little trust in Wasps that they had to seek assurances that they would honour an existing contract. That puts them up there with SISU so if that was the case why would the council sell to them.

But its not about who is to blame, its about ensuring there is a club to support not season.

While Wasps might not see us as big enough to impact them financially, although despite them saying that publicly its highly debatable - our value to them is not just in terms of money CCFC hand over to them, what we have seen is they fear protest and negative publicity. That is why I believe...

From the Telegraph

I don't get why we need it. We've already got a coat of arms, why not just use that?

Looking at the reaction to the Trusts statement on facebook, twitter and on here it seems they've massively misjudged the feeling among supporters. Hopefully they will act swiftly to put things right.

Always a handful but most supporters of other clubs would not wish what we're going through on anyone. This did make me laugh

Posted this yesterday

So close, I only need a 'Why aren't you on the board' for bingo. :woot:

Its almost like they are willing Wasps to send the club to the wall so they can sit around saying told you so and talk about how evil SISU are. Who is their target audience with this kind of thing? Nobody wants SISU here or thinks they are good owners. Won't even reach SISU and Sepalla. Or do...

After so many losses I can't imagine SISU can believe they'll win but equally if Wasps were confident SISU would lose they wouldn't need to apply pressure to drop the legals. That's what doesn't make sense to me. Yes its an annoyance to Wasps and there is a cost involved but the cost relative...

It matters because Wasps are claiming in their statement that they can't agree a new deal. Not that they have taken a decision that they won't. Its a subtle but hugely important difference.

You'd have to ask them but its hardly unusual in the business world. For example Samsung and Apple still do business with each despite being involved in numerous lawsuits against each other around the world since 2011.

I have no desire to see Wasps fold. Would be happy to see them move back to London. The Brentford Community Stadium would be ideal, only just over a mile from where Wasps played from 1923-1996. That's the ground Wasps claim rugby was banned from, since shown to be false as in Feb 2017 Brentford...

Agreed, don't think you can blame the medical staff, or lack of them. We're 2 weeks past the game and despite seeing specialists nobody is able to say what the injury is and how severe it is. The alternative is everytime a player goes down injured they get substituted 'just in case'.

If somebody wants to do a deal with the club they'd speak to the club wouldn't they? I can't imagine for one minute Sepalla sorting out details of the retail contract with Just Sports or speaking to the company that does our programs.

And as Gervais has said on twitter they nominated Mel Gibson last year. He's hardly got a history clear of controversy.

Nothing on the trust website, think someone at Cov Mad is on the wind up. Even the trust couldn't come out with a statement that weak for a situation as serious this.