Search results

If you take the stance you only care about CCFC Then unless we can't survive without 16k a month. Then a quick agreement has to be best

If they did Paxman The deal would be done tonight. :) I would have a 5 year incentivised contract drawn up Every year SISU achieve certain mutually agreed objectives. They het the option to buy a percentage if the stadium at a discounted price. Each year they do this the rent...

And me to be honest. However stop side tracking the thread. Do you think the quickest way this would get sorted is if SISU now compromised.

Probably, worth a try though Hopefully we will discuss just the rent and not ray ransons dogs name. Do think the quickest solution now and probably the easiest to happen would be for SISU to compromise.

The other ones have transcended into a pro SISU, Anti SISU Farce, Ray Ranson etc etc I just wanted a thread discussing the rent and the how this should get resolved the quickest and for it to stay on topic

The idea that if you want the best for CCFC you will want SISU to get their own way regarding this negotiation, does not seem correct to me. I think if you want the best for CCFC you will just want the club to come to an agreement as quick as possible. SISU staunchly refusing to compromise...

At 1:30 am on bbc1? If they did come up with an excellent non footballing marketing plan then I don't think in the current climate this would be a massive factor. If the Ricoh deal ended tomorrow the current plight of the football club would not have investors flocking! I would guess...

In a way? so not your traditional fat cats, pigs in trough scenario, Grendal has painted. With ACL getting fat off the back of SISU's hard work?

All goes into profits for ACL as a company?

And they put this profit in their own pockets?

How much do ACL personally pocket from having their noses in the trough

How much money have they pocketed from this trough?

Anyway, those who say if you don't back SISU regarding the rent you are not a true supporter rubbish! You just have a bit if moral fibre about you.

At the moment yes as that is the main purpose of the stadium. If you are about to go out of business due to the action of that football club, maybe try to attract another football club if that us allowed? Or try and find another purpose for the stadium that will keep you in business if that...

Fair play to them they obviously believed that Southampton would actually see it through with winding them up.

The main purpose of the stadium. is a football club. Other sources of income are supposed to be supplementary I am sure the other sources if income ACL have generated has allowed them to come down by 66%

If the rent is too high then SISU should have renegotiated at the point of taking over. That was their remiss and not ACL's fault. Comparing us to other league one rents. Again we are in league one because of the poor manner in which SUSU ran their business. SISU say it is not because they...

Personally I don't agree with the concept 'if you support Coventry different moral rules apply if it helps Coventry' I felt this about our signing if Marlon. I wasn't aware that we shafted Southampton out of money for Leon Best. I assume we have now been forced to pay that? Where do you...

Do you think though. That if that is true. That TF would allow AT to come out and attack him in the media afterwards. TF knows how to use the media A lot of the country were looking at Coventry and making comments about what a joke it is to sack a manager after three games of a new season...

Wasn't he at the same level as Joyless as well!