Search results

I think it would be a SBT anti-social to be honest.

For a club with our history then no. For this team at this time under the current circumstances then a top six finish in this league is a real achievement.

True, but without the deduction we'd still be in with a shout despite what many on here seem to think has been a poor season.

If that was the case then no Council anywhere in the country would ever have made any legal boo boos.

Is that the "bigger picture" thing you were talking about?

I'm not calling him anything. I'm just stating what Harris from ACL said. It's him that seems to be doing that, not me. Presumably, you have the contrary view?

You're joking right? That's not really happened has it?

Be careful you don't wet yourself.

Ah, one man's "jumping to conclusions" is another man's "possibilities". Got you now.

He said jumping to conclusions.

We'll find out in due course, I guess.

Or the letter got lost in the post maybe.

Agreed. However, for Harris to mention it in court then he must be pretty sure that's the way it happened.

You can disagree with me, of course, that's the point of a discussion forum. However you decided to make it personal with the "people who really know about football" comment and you continue with this reply too. You can argue your point without being insulting. You seem to be arguing for the...

Er....splutter, splutter....etc

I thought Harris said West said SISU had been informed when in fact West hadn't informed them.

Yes, they could be the "base" (the word I used remember), the "building blocks". Carry on being argumentative with yourself, I've had enough.

As opposed to blindly disagreeing with someone because they're not, do you mean?

Ah, it's all about "the big picture", is it? So, to "encourage" that you slag off fellow fans and tell them they are wrong? I agree with you though on something though, the responsibility is down to the owners. Not the fans, as you like to make out.