Search results

How does your logic work exactly? So, if you were there yesterday, not knowing anything and you witnessed the intervention, it would be 'Well done, mate, you're a hero.' He then responds with 'I was convicted for murder some years ago.' You would reply with 'Then you are not a hero at all.'...

Yup. Totally opposed to the death penalty and the knowledge that there is always human error and will always be mistakes, is reason enough. The killing of one wrongly convicted person is one too many.

Disagree. On the surface, based on the information we have at hand, that was a heroic thing to do.

True. I actually meant he should never have been released now. This should have never happened. 20 or 30 years down the line, who knows, but this was way, way too soon.

Nope. This incident yesterday has to be treated in complete isolation.

Mother of that 2004 victim. "He is not a hero. He is a murderer out on day release, which us as a family didn't know anything about. He murdered a disabled girl. He is not a hero, absolutely not. ' Yesterday, he WAS a hero. Murderer, or not.

He she never have been considered safe. They should have listened to the judge from 2012.

Yes, Robinson. Couldn't stand the man.

Yes, I get that, but why wasn't he searched when he got there?

I have never, ever had a Labour candidate come to my door before. I don't know much at all about this new Labour candidate unfortunately.

Then you would have to ask yourself, as the judge recommended that this man should not be released for many, many years, why on earth would they only fit him with a standard tag? Just being back home at a certain time of night is not going to stop him carrying out any terrorist act at any other...

It was shameful. He can try and defend it all he likes, but to send Gove and his dad in, complete with film crew, is disrespectful and not taking the global climate crisis seriously enough at all. I have now had three Tory leaflets through my door and had a phone call off them too. They seem...

Hmm, something not quite right here I don't think. Apparently he had a previous terrorist conviction and was out on licence and wearing an electronic tag following his release. He was from Staffordshire, so surely it would have been flagged up that he was now in London and in the vicinity of...

Yes and unfortunately his neck starts at the top of his ankles.

Just been confirmed following a press conference by police.

They wouldn't. If they see a vest that appears to be an explosive vest they would be quite right to immediately shoot the perpetrator.

Nope. Just on the surface it all seems right and proper, but we only have a snapshot of the incident and what led up to the shooting.

Again, if the police didn't expect it to be a life threatening situation they would surely have deployed tasers. The fact he was immediately shot appears to show there was still significant threat to life, with possibly a suicide vest involved or the man in potential possession of a loaded weapon.

How can anyone say that? Based on the footage shown I don't see how you can come to any other conclusion than the response units still believed that there was still a significant threat.

The appeal now just needs to come back saying it is going to be a hotel for students