Search results

If we get through this is by far a bigger game than the CheckATrade. Need to get the bandwagon rolling and everyone on board.

I saw that and felt old.

In the long term it could be but it depends what follows. If we get to the final and go up is it the start of a turnaround or will we be a mid table, looking over our shoulder L1 side trying to avoid relegation every year. If we don't go up it can either be built on next season and have a...

Very nervous but I've supported long enough to always expect the worst!

Don't really have a problem with an end of season pitch invasion if something has been achieved and it can be done with out leading to trouble. Look at the way it was handled when Southampton went up and we went down. Celebrations from them and acknowledgement of what we were going through. But...

Had a look the other day and there's well under 100 refs for the PL and FL. Surely with all the money in the professional game they should all be up to standard. Mistakes happen but the volume of obvious errors is a big issue. With promotion and relegation having a financial implication how...

Will they be fighting the other Forest fans that are going to give us a kicking? Some people need to grow up.

I'll give you my answer in 12 months time. If we don't go up this season but build on it, rather than another rebuild, and then get autos next time round then job done. Just taken longer than hoped. If we get rid of half the squad and start all over again and miss out again next year who knows...

Few weeks back a couple of chaps near me were having a full on argument with one claiming the lino had missed a clear offside and the other pointing out it was direct from a goal kick. The offside chap got on google to 'prove' he was right. Went very quiet when he read the rules!

What does that have to do with anything? Its either on tape or its not.

How is Nolan allowed to raise it? Looking at the FA website it says the referee can raise an issue he saw but without a clear view or the FA can raise things completely missed by the referee. It also says it has be for a sending off offence so the only one that applies is: So for that to apply...

There's no way that if Duffy thinks he's being deliberately stamped on he's saying he's saying that after the game. And don't put words into other peoples mouths. If it was a stamp I'd accept our player being banned and would expect an opponent to be banned but this was nothing like a stamp...

What are you on about, even Duffy said after the match it was accidental! Presumably there will also be a charge for the assault on McNulty?

From the FA player handbook: RETROSPECTIVE ACTION • Please note that The FA has the power to take retrospective action for sending off offences which were not witnessed by the Match Officials. • Players run the risk of being banned retrospectively particularly where such an incident is caught on...

That's the point. The threat level prior to that event wasn't raised to the highest level, which is critical. The steward on Saturday was claiming searches were a legal requirement as the match had been given the highest threat level for terrorism. That would mean there was an expected imminent...

Didn't Duffy say it wasn't a deliberate stamp in a post-match interview?

They are brushing the problem under the carpet. Nobody can have watched the officiating at our games this season and believe its up to the required standard. Yet if Robins or any of the players make a comment on the low standard they will be up for disciplinary action meanwhile nothing is done...

British government to host summit on why other countries should join the EU