Search results

I'm not sure I've ever wanted to be wrong more in my life because if I am thousands of people will still be alive and that is worth as much humble pie as I can shove down my gob.

A fucking prick who up til now has largely supported the message of the Tories and thought Corbyn was useless. But now he's actually doing something close to what he's supposed to do (with a fair amount of self-promotion added in it must be said) you want him sacked because he's not supportive...

We're going down (very slowly) because of the restrictions that were in place. They've relaxed them at a point where the R rate is literally just on the cusp of being acceptable. So if you remove those restrictions that's got it down what do you think's going to happen? You must've seen the busy...

How dare you! I'm only 21st.

Am I the only one trying to come up with lyrics to Pulp so I can do "Common (Sense) People"?

Team talk "we're going to start by putting everything to the left, then mix it up slightly by putting a little bit down the right. If you get tired put your hands on your hips and bend your knees. If you rotate your hips you're crazy. Just keep that up lads"

If they moan about the wrong brand next time don't pick them up an alternative. Just stick rigidly to the list and tell them not in stock. Next time I'd imagine they'd be happy with an alternative.

Simple solution - ignore the WUM/troll. Clearly doing it for the attention and getting people's backs up so ignore it. Don't reply to anything ever. If they aren't getting any attention, short term they'll try and up the ante with the insults but if you continue to ignore them they'll get bored...

I think you'd have to pay someone to take the ringroad off your hands.

Yep. It's like telling people arriving at a zoo you're protected from the pride of lions with all these measures then just letting one of them loose.

Trouble is we need someone else to not go into lockdown so all those naysayers arguing that lockdown is not saving people can see the evidence it is. We've handled this incredibly badly, but we could have handled it even worse (and probably would have if the public hadn't basically decided to...

But if the next meeting only requires a majority, why bother making it 75% for that one? Why not set a time limit today and then put the 51% rule in for the final vote rather than coming back?

It's just becoming a joke. How can there be anyone left in the country who can't see they treat people as completely stupid if they put stuff like that out and expect it to be accepted as true?

It's ridiculous. He knows it going back up should lead to reintroducing lockdown but that stops the economy starting again which I imagine a lot of his party are looking for. So got to find a reason to continue on this path. I've heard it had something to do with the care homes, but it's way...

Privatisation proving to be a bit shit then.....

The way I read it was there was no need for a negative test response, so basically if you don't test them they can't be refused as they've not tested positive for the disease. If they truly wanted to protect the vulnerable then the first stipulation should be a negative test (even though this...

What a surprise. But hey, private enterprise makes things more efficient and better run.....

If that is the case I apologise. But the point stands that if this is such an issue to you why as you so steadfastly behind an ethos that wants to privatise everything and make it all about profit rather than the service? This is where it leads. The way you vote has directly led to this awful...

We'd lose on super-over.

So how do teams that are tens of millions or more in debt find that money? If they can I argue that they don't need admin, just financial restructuring. This really needs challenging properly though. If, say, the regulatory body of gas fitters said all gas trade creditors had to be paid in full...