Search results

He just seems more involved and energetic in getting around. Plus I feel he's more likely to pop up with a goal. If Westbrooke is dropped it'll be for a more attacking option of either O'Hare or Allen so that'd be more useful than Westbrooke's contribution IMO. Of course if O'Hare and Allen are...

Yeah. 4-0 up before Clough hit a hat-trick before half time. I'm glad someone else thought Livingstone hit a hat-trick because I swore that's who it was too. But every report of the match says it was Gallagher

He did alright for a bit to be fair to him, but I just felt he wasn't that great and would just be another on the merry-go-round and got rid of a year or two later. Still preferable to Coleman mind.

Please do. I may have missed it. And thanks for being polite enough to ask - most people would've just found the quote and posted it.

Racist ;)

Most memorable for me was 5-4 vs Forest in the league cup. And the final game.

We got Coleman because it's who Ranson, SISU's main advisor at the time wanted. He wanted him from the start. Even if Pearson (who I personally don't rate) or anyone else had been available he'd have still picked Coleman. I'd have even preferred Dowie to stay than get Coleman!

It appears to me it's exactly what BSB thinks. Nowhere does he suggest the queen should actually use that power, he just says she has it.

It's like the teachers going on teacher training the day school restarts after 6 weeks off. Only rather than a day it's 3 fucking weeks and you're halfway through the first term.

The question asked was whether the Queen had the ABILITY to stop proroguing. She does have the ability to. She just (wisely) chooses not to do so. But I bet she and her advisors are absolutely livid at Alexander for putting her in such a position. But then he does only ever think of himself.....

Because your Dear Leader never did anything so crass as increase his public profile on HIGNFY numerous times did he......?

Either way we're tenants at someone else's stadium. So IF the option were be to return to the Ricoh for the same rent/conditions asin Brum or staying at St Andrews, pithc issues aside, it'd only make sense to go back for the higher crowds and therefore revenue. Plus if you think about it were...

With Utd and City being such big draws why not just 'Greater Manchester United?' Manchester is always saying how using the city's name brings advantages to the entire metropolitan area (even though many indicators suggest the huge majority of them go to the city and any ill effects are normally...

But you have two governing bodies - the PL and EFL. PL is there to look after the interests of its members, not the EFL's. To distribute more cash down would be then doing something disadvantageous to their own members.

I know I saw at some stage a note to the accounts stating management fees were being paid to SISU. Probably weren't the most recent but I'm absolutely certain I saw it because it took me by surprise.

But is sitting there accruing compound interest instead. They are payable and could be called in at any time the owners choose - we're relying on them not doing so. It's like having a bomb in the corner and saying "it's fine, it's not going to go off". And then putting a hand grenade next to it...

Boris chancers?

Would be a nice roundness to it. Charles I - end of monarchy Charles II - reformation of monarchy Charles III - end of monarchy. So until Charles IV turns up we'd be a republic. To be honest, I think Charles is likely to get the question asked - he likes having his opinion on stuff, esp...

Well it's a bit of both really. They're using the transfer fees but there is also an annual loss that needs to be covered by SISU (which they do stand to gain from long term)

But he could sell the club for its worth AND also the debt he's owed