Search results

You obviously have in writing something to the contrary then, John?

That's the Council lot!

Here you go, just for you:

Not as many times as you though!

You haven't commented on the number of boxes being wheeled into the Court yet. I'm a little disappointed.

Similarly, seems shortsighted to have pegged the rent so high in the first place.

I remember PWKH dismissing the story as nothing that was discussed in detail, so yeah, we'll see, I guess. The rent was ridiculous so it's not rocket science to assume CCFC wanted to do something about it, even at that early stage whilst we were in the Championship getting fairly healthy crowds.

Rob has made several major mistakes since joining: 1. Criticising the council 2. Criticising OSB Big no no's.

Yep.

I think he means "The Club" not SISU. It was Robinson, etc. There was an article in CET at the time. Surprised Simon G hasn't mentioned that....:thinking about:

Ah, evidence now provided (apparently) that Club believed rent was unaffordable back in '06. As I've mentioned previously, the club asked ACL for a discussion on rent negotiation in December 2005.

Agree. Also why on earth did McGinnity think the rent was affordable in the first place?

Your "secret meeting" accusations weren't sad at all, were they John? :whistle:

Well, showing round PH4 was a pretty good indicator of that.

I'm the same when I hear that ACL offered the Ricoh for free.

Not me. I don't care who "wins" as long as City go back to the Ricoh.

There you go. See his next post. Now, that's what I call divisive bullshit.

Don't disagree. However, some want a CCC "victory" no matter what the consequences.

And more important than anything else too, I imagine.

DOn't agree it has to be so one sided as you'd like it to be. As long as we are back at the Ricoh then ultimately I don't care who is "shown up". CCFC in Coventry is more important than petty one upmanship.