Search results

They should do the table as number of arrests 10K attending then you get a better idea how teams compare.

Won't be long before they give Jimmy at go at 3 they way we are going!

You can have a post-legislative referendum as we had on the parliamentary voting system. Are you being deliberately obtuse? You've said yourself the referendum was not legally binding so why are you still arguing that it was? You can make all the arguments you like about will of the people...

Because they were irrelevant to the discussion and factually incorrect as I hadn't forgotten either of those things. However neither has any relevance over the content of the act. You've responded to a comment linking Astute, at his request, to documents showing it wasn't legally binding saying...

You two should join the campaign for a second vote as you're both doing a brilliant job of showing that people didn't actually know what they were voting on. I'm actually quite shocked. DIdn't realise there was people who were claiming the result was legally binding. What in the EU...

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/36/pdfs/ukpga_20150036_en.pdf http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7212/CBP-7212.pdf

Loads of burglaries and vehicle crime. Pretty much on a nightly basis people with CCTV report people trying car doors, checking for ways into houses etc. The criminals are becoming more confident. They know there’s no police and they are unlikely to get caught. Burglaries are reculalry...

In Finham, and I’m sure it won’t be the only area, the police themselves have suggested local residents patrol the streets.

I haven't said I'm unhappy. You seem to have assumed what I voted for incorrectly. It was an advisory referendum, that is a simple fact. It could have been a legally binding referendum, as the one several years back regarding our voting system was, but that was not what was agreed to therefore...

Whether I'm happy with it or not is irrelevant. It was an advisory referendum, the time for complaining about that was when the referendum terms were being agreed. However you could definitely make an argument for a second referendum had remain won, especially if close. You could argue that...

How does that work then? Or does that mean that Gilbert messed up the dates and nobody else bothered to check so reported based off what he had tweeted!

Makes me laugh that so many people are now acting like this is on a par with the World Cup or Euros!

Well that's how parliament normally works and we're told that people want parliament to have the power to make more decisions. My personal preference, with hindsight being a wonderful thing, would be for parliament to debate and agree upon our negotiating stance (things like customs union...

Highly recommended for stand-up fans. Bill Burr is coming to the NEC. Bill Burr Tickets | Concert Dates & Tour | The Ticket Factory

It was always advisory, was no mention at all of it being binding in the Referendum Act. The briefing paper very clearly states 'it does not contain any requirement for the UK government to implement the result'. 50% plus 1 sounds great until you actually put any thought in to it. Cameron...

You'd expect deadlines in legal cases to not have that sort of flexibility! Do they have to give a plausible reason for needing an extension?

Given the choice between independent experts and a video by Paul Joseph Watson who Wikipedia describes as a alt-right conspiracy theorist I know who I believe.

SISU and the right thing to do and not compatible.

Sure SISU will have something up their sleeve. Can’t see them just walking away.