Search results

Think we can get a pretty good idea from the councils reponse to the Butts. As soon as there was a hint we might move there they set about ensuring professional football was forbidden in the lease.

I believe if they won there would need to be a desperate case claiming compensation. At that points the fans would have to somehow get the message across that any compensation needs to be ringfenced for CCFC not SISU.

Even if he does believe the forum, with more members than the trust who like to keep reminding everyone they are the biggest fans group, it’s not just on here. The response everywhere has been the same. Of course there are those who just want to rant against SISU and nobody else but most can...

You'd have to compare to what other clubs pay. The quality of the stadium wouldn't really come in to it as the money from all the non-ticketing revenue streams don't benefit the club. So you'd be looking for clubs at a similar level with similar attendances. No idea what that would be, or if...

So if it was impossible why say it? Don't think its much of an argument to say all local taxpayers should have knowledge of property law and what is and isn't allowed. If the council are saying it was a condition of sale then it should be in some form or another.

No idea, wouldn't be my plan of action but possibilities are: they believe they will win; they hope it will send ACL bust; its not costing them anything (either legals on retainer or no win no fee); someone made Joy read the entire EU thread so now she's punishing us.

There's a weird obsession with modernising everything. Sometimes people need to sit back and realise the traditional approach that's stood the test of time is the best option.

Couldn't care less what the morons want to do to each other if there's no danger of innocent bystanders getting caught up to it or any damage to anyone's property.

Realistically, given there have been protests before, during and after games home and away, disruption to matches, people on the pitch, local and national media pieces and protests at their London offices what do you think fans can do that will make Seppalla decide to cease all current and...

There's been plenty of constructive comments, ideas for things that could be done or areas they could improve. For some reason you've chosen to ignore them and instead turn the thread into the usual argument.

CCC are still the freeholder. They could have inserted whatever clauses they liked in to the lease.

You have no idea what I have or haven't done. But as I have said many times on this and other threads it is firmly my belief that individuals forming more small fans groups is counter productive. Everyone needs to unite behind one figurehead and the trust are the obvious candidates.

You can be the biggest Wasps fan in the city, doesn't have to follow that you're happy to see the football club go under. The reasons you state are exactly why I suggested the trust should be pushing other angles such as the work Sky Blues in the Community does and the economic benefits of...

Exactly, what they are saying now is that they had so little trust in Wasps that they had to seek assurances that they would honour an existing contract. That puts them up there with SISU so if that was the case why would the council sell to them.

But its not about who is to blame, its about ensuring there is a club to support not season.

While Wasps might not see us as big enough to impact them financially, although despite them saying that publicly its highly debatable - our value to them is not just in terms of money CCFC hand over to them, what we have seen is they fear protest and negative publicity. That is why I believe...

From the Telegraph

I don't get why we need it. We've already got a coat of arms, why not just use that?