Search results

Unless we sell or we get some more sell-on money I don't think we'll have the budget and if you were the owners wouldn't you be starting to question MR's scouting and signing of strikers, or at the very least the coaching of those players? Plus by then Godden will be looking to come back in...

That's the first week of January sorted. What about the rest of the transfer window?

O'Hare hasn't been as effective as a starter as he was as a sub certainly

Make a sub to time waste?

Next time one of our players scores an amazing goal I'm putting money on them getting sent off the following week.

How have we managed to pick up a red and two yellows and they've not got one?

Getting to that point where they score.....

Forgot he'd gone off for Shipley. D'oh

Take Westbrroke off and put Kasta on maybe?

Usually

Anyone know how long Hiwula is out for?

It is starting to get a bit conspiracy theorist with the shocking refs we keep getting.

Not sure about Walsh for Watson. We didn't have much out wide to begin with. Would anyone sacrifice a midfielder for a bit of (maybe) attacking threat from Kasta?

What formation are we playing now? 3-4-2?

Just when you go and praise him he gets sent off. May I suggest you go back to calling him shit in future ;)

No great surpise. Still very light attacking wise on the bench considering we've got three centre midfielders. Would've thought Bremang would've been in ahead of Eccles.

On the whole I agree but when repeatedly pressed on an issue by a journalist he does become the bumbling buffoon and slips up. Unfortunately there are some that lap up those kind of performances as they like to see 'the clown' performing.

££££ Maybe he'd want to resign Bayliss for his new team - sell-on clause coming our way ;)

Part of me really hopes that Corbyn and Labour aren't railroaded into increasing focus on Brexit but keep it on the wider picture. It would be interesting to see how a Tory leave-heavy campaign, a LD remain-heavy campaign and a Labour multi-issue focus played out.

That one was particularly poorly written. The 'benefit the rich' undercurrent to it was far too transparent which made it all the more infuriating when they're trying to pass it off as a benefit to the man on the street (and even that benefit was an unintentional side effect).