Search results

A rule that every club ignores. Southampton kicked an old chap out for having a half time swig form a hip flask and there was uproar down there. Should get this one in the CT, they’ll soon backtrack.

Sounds serious, his family have posted on Twitter that he’s lucky to be alive. Also said Robins went to the hospital and stayed with him until they got there.

Indeed they could but I suspect Wasps refuse to talk to football club and forcibly remove fans will generate more press than fans hang around for 30 minutes after a match will. FairPlay to anyone who is doing anything but not sure it will achieve much if it is just a repeat of the last couple...

Stop asking awkward questions.

Sit in could work. Wasps have a home game tomorrow, if people refused to leave until Wasps agreed to open talks with the club that might do something or at the very least give them a bit of a panic.

The statistics that show stop and search doesn't work against violent crime | WIRED UK

Why go to work when you can get people to just send you money!

And that's the part the matters. What SISU had planned is irrelevant to the point being made. The council, ACL, trust, Hoffman, Elliot etc were all getting excited about new owners. Even on here we were discussing who the new owners might be, which Chinese companies it could be funding Bing...

Couple of other things from Byng on the facebook group. He has said that in May 2014, he wrote to City Council to ask it confirm that there was any truth in the rumour that Wasps were proposing to buy the lease of the Ricoh and received a written reply from a very senior officer of the Council...

There's a big difference between spinning, which is what we are used to with most politicians, and outright lying over an extended period of time. Find it quite surprising that anyone would happily accept being lied to and even having the lier, when caught out, turn round and basically say...

As I can't go thanks to it being moved to a Friday night it will no doubt be the performance of the season and we'll win 5-0.

That can't be true as his reason for having to name them was a big conspiracy to cover it all up despite them having being named in the media prior to the media blackout being put in place.

Bullied? You said it was something Nick had completely made up out of thin air, I pointed out it was something Cov Utd have said themselves. Hardly bullying.

Indeed but that doesn't solve the problem. If they all move on elsewhere the 'new' club that now has the golden share still doesn't have any players, coaches or a manger.

They've said themselves the club was set up in response to the clubs move to Northampton, hardly a conspiracy theory.

The company that owned Rangers, the equivalent of Otium, was liquidated. A new club was then formed under the ownership of a new company.

You're making the assumption that SISU would fold the club should the share be removed. No guarantee of that.

State control? What on earth are you on about. You're now saying a framework should be in place for private enterprise yet you are also saying we should ignore the framework that the council should be working to that is already in place. Isn't company law the framework for private enterprise?

Is it about Man Utd?