Search results

I think they detach SISU from their club. They see it as ACL against SISU (who happen to be the latest owners of their club. ) They then look at each parties behaviour and make a judgement based on that. The problem as we now see if you support what SISU do when you think it may suit Cov...

I agree sometimes people get a thrill trying to get 'bites' from people and throwing in subtle abuse it is a bit sad really

Did SISU know what the rent was when they bought the club?

Or it couldn't what is his role regarding the Ricoh? I imagine the council just need to know over a period of time that the owners can be trusted with the Ricoh. Unlike the current ones.

Is this hypothetical? As in if they were not planning to move 30 miles away for three years then maybe build a 8-10 k stadium outside Coventry?

SISU's decision to try and break ACL has cost us big time. Encouraging them not to agree to the compromise and encouraging them in their stance I would have said has cost big time, if I thought for one second that SISU cared or listened to those fans who supported their stance. They pay...

They got planning permission in 2002 it was built in 2011 It cost 93 million It has a capacity of 32 k The club were allowed to play in Brighton whilst they waited.

Thanks for the reply The choice of management if wrong is their decision. If a chairman makes lots of bad decisions in choosing a manager. They tend to end up going. If a manager chooses or buys the wrong players they tend to get moved on. If a player tends to make bad decisions on the...

It's strange though that 8 parties are aware of that and still seem to want to buy Coventry City Maybe by agreeing a rent of 400k Then buying half of ACL so your rent is actually 200k a year. Maybe by investing in the site and the squad you can make money?

However you can only judge SISU by what they have done. Not by someone else's actions

ACL are saying the doors are open for Mr Appleton to do a deal to play at the Ricoh as he controls CCFC as happened for the final 3 games. SISU are saying holdings need to do the deal as they own the club. Both think if one does the deal that shows that company run the club.

Well I am not sure who exactly it is not conducive to?

What a very strange thing to say. Why would someone analysing the finances of SISU in our current predicament. Ever be considered not conducive?

I know it's a shame as there was stuff in there explaining the Ryton thing. That people were asking about. Which I clearly put when I brought it up

7th? Why does he care surely he would not be bidding for something that us worthless?

Some would have sided with SISU enough said At least you have seen the light

That said I think there is stuff in here regarding the Ryton ownership?

Some people, it is just bizarre!

100 % agree

In all honesty, do one. People were asking about if we own Ryton or not. This thread has info about it. I clearly say there is info in here about it.