Search results

The difference between an average of 2K and 4K is not that significant in the scheme of things (the revenue difference might feasibly be eclipsed by the proceeds of one FA Cup tie at OT, the Emirates or somewhere similar). The fact they don't have to pay 600K to ACL has probably eased things a...

Any proposal will surely be nowhere near those built up areas being referred to (it will be on the edge of the Coventry administrative boundary). For example, build a stadium next to the A46 in an area covered by Rugby District Council (say at Ansty Park), a location just yards from the edge of...

While CCFC exists, and while a return to Coventry is still the stated aim, a new club will not take off IMO.

Cool. I wasn't being sarcastic when I said that either. It is a point worth making though I think. If a new ground was in Exhall, Bedworth, Binley Woods or in greenbelt within 1 mile of the city boundary in any direction it would not contravene FL rules.

Totally agree. I was all against the idea of going, but the more people carry on with the name calling, character assassinations and old ladies being mugged analogies, the more tempted I am to say fuck it and go.

I suspect he means the area in between, around Lenton's Lane/Alderman's Green Road.

Google can be a friend to you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_and_Bedworth_Urban_Area

ACL taking legal action against NTFC is just the latest in a long line of ludicrous developments in this sorry mess. It will be laughed out of court. Embarrassing.

Actually, the club have to play in the conurbation/urban area from which they take their name - unfortunately most City fans have no understanding of what a conurbation is, let alone what area the Coventry Urban Area covers. Yet again we'll have accusations that the FL have broken their own...

So your stance is the same as mine then. Well done. I merely pointed out that you made a bit of a fool of yourself by declaring the picture a fake when it is clearly from today, and you then started bleating on about my posting history, suggested I was the photographer and ranted about the...

The more you try and make sense of it, the less sense it makes. I heard a couple of whispers earlier about takeover talks. No more than whispers though amongst the corporate stiffs today, but that has only come second hand. You just have to hope it's true.

Fair enough. I think we've all had about enough of it.

Just because you keep saying it doesn't make it any more true. Never coming back? Behave. We'll be back before Christmas.

I think it will, but expect it to go up a bit against Preston first.

Worst analogy in the history of SBT, a website with a long history of crap analogies.

What are you talking about? No I didn't take the picture, but it was clearly taken by someone who was stood on the hill. The fact that you can't see the other parts of the ground is precisely because that person was STOOD ON THE HILL and didn't have a camera that can see around corners...

How will they sleep tonight eh? Stop wasting oxygen.

Why does it matter? SISU paid for them I suspect, just like they pay for everything else. They have close to zero income at the moment in case you haven't noticed. I'm sure when you are hemorrhaging millions some personal protection for the chief exec is hardly going to worry you too much.

That IS today's game you fool.

The more people talk about standing on the hill, the more chance that it will be closed for health and safety reasons. I wouldn't mention it anymore otherwise you'll end up staring at the back of the stand and will see nothing - but more importantly will not be seen.