Search results

Will happen anyway. If we're not playing there they'll lose all that trade. Sure they're well aware of that and have raised it with Wasps.

Once again we've been massively let down by the local media who allow Eastwood and Wasps to fire out statements yet fail to question them. As soon as their statement was released people were point out it was impossible for the club or its owners to stop the EC investigation. Why are the local...

You don't fancy a go on this then?

Certainly seems that the more you read about the differences between the way these things are handled in the UK and EU the more you can see why Wasps and the council are desperate for it to not progress.

Quite possibly but that was for Wasps lawyers to sort out at the time. If they decided it wasn't possible and took the risk anyway its not on to then look to the football club to bail them out.

Surprised me as well, certainly didn't expect SISU to sign up for anything like that.

Maybe they'll apply it to everything going forward. Lets say the Wasps manager gets done for drunk driving and get a couple of years inside, we could send Robins along to do his time.

Can pretty much guarantee that conversation isn't talking place but again its a question the local media should be asking of Wasps. Why are you expecting CCFC to indemnify you and not CCC who, in the event of a payout having to be made, be the organisation at fault. Not to mention asking why...

For that to happen CCC would have to be found to be in the wrong, possibly along with Wasps as well. If that's the case surely the blame is on them not SISU? And if they aren't found to be in the wrong the EC will chuck it out and no harm done to Wasps.

You don't understand what is actually happening do you? I'd suggest reading up on the process that will be followed should the EC decide the complaint warrants an investigation. Wasps laid out the terms they deemed acceptable for talks and a new deal. Those terms were met. Wasps then changed...

Of course not Nick, the two things are completely unrelated.

If the EC find no case to answer it won't progress. There will be no cost to Wasps and no implications for Wasps. If the EC find their is a case to answer it will be for the council to defend not Wasps. If wrongdoing is found surely every taxpayer would support the recovery of money owed to the...

Wasps have been buzzing around Ricoh Arena for years https://www.therugbyblog.com/was-richardsons-wasps-takeover-just-a-step-on-the-road-to-the-ricoh/

No, and nowhere have I said that. Why was it obvious what the reaction of Wasps would be? Wasps laid down conditions for talks and the club / SISU met them. As a CCFC fan I want the club to play in the city so obviously aren't happy with anything that jepordieses that. But as has been stated...

Nobody can be that stupid. Does he seriously think in court cases the judge goes through every statement made line by line and gives an individual ruling on the validity of the statement?

I've even sent him that article but he still insists the Telegraph is right. We should be going to Keith Perry rather than OSB when there are any financial queries as clearly he's the expert.

That will be the court case SISU lost as the judge said they couldn't bundle it all in together and count it as one transaction :facepalm:

Lets hope the EC don't compare it against the price for the original 50 year lease :joyful:

This is the question the media should be hammering Wasps with. From the position we are in now what is it they want / expect the club to do to enable talks to resume?

Maybe you can point out where I, and the vast majority of people on this thread, are wrong. Clearly you have insight the rest of us don't. I'll make it easy for you. 1) what can SISU do to halt the EC investigation as Wasps have now made this a condition to resume talks? 2) what action or...