Search results

So apparently "everyone knows" is not correct, which is why an independent review/audit/enquiry, call it what you will is a good idea. I'm sure everything will be fine and the Council have acted legally - though not morally - by the book. Fair enough.

Handwritten notes from a meeting of Labour councillors, August 2012. http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/2015/01/20/news-Hell-freezes-over-before-council-sells-Ricoh-to-Sky-Blues-125086.html

To be honest there's no need for a "moral audit", is there? As most people apart from the Telegraph, Italia, Dongo, Noggin, MMM and a few others think it wasn't the right thing to do.

You could be right if Mutton's first name is Anne.

And what if we haven't? Does it matter if it's checked and double-checked? What are you worried about?

Can only be a good thing, can't it. If evidence shows anything underhand then it can be dealt with, it they are shown to have played by the book, then we can all get on with it.

And I don't understand why some people are so terrified that CCC may have been less than honest with the club or the taxpayer over the Wasps deal. Not saying they have, just saying that a lot on here seem pretty much hysterical over their defence of Lucas/CCC. Surely, we want the truth and...

NOPM? Fair enough, that's up to you. Wanting your club liquidated though is out of order. Sisu won't be here for ever.

Nutshell.

Hold on though. Didn't you say that CCC did screw the club but they had no choice?

I remember seeing him score direct from a corner.

It was attributed to "Anne". Pretty sure that's not his name.

Probably because balls were plain white in those days. None of these new fangled coloured balls.

It was probably warmer where you were! Luckily, I had me parka on.

Sensible Soccer was always my favourite.

Yeah, that's the one that sticks in my mind. Also, I missed the chant "We want an orange ball..." We seemed to sing that fairly often in the late 70s, into the 80s.

Yes, they did. However, they made the mistake of criticizing CCC. A no-no in these parts.

And amusing coming from someone who mentions the phrase "one point of view".

Actually I was just highlighting the fact that Private Eye and the Observer are in league with SISU. Obviously, the Council are innocent and Ann is a lovely person.

Apologies, I scanned it and OCR is a little rubbish, but you'll get the gist.